Site /
AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).
Site.2020LouisianaAOKPropertyLateArrivingMember History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
March 31, 2022, at 04:05 AM
by - AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir.
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: CITE:)
(:description CITE:)
(:keywords charging order, single member, sole member, only member, SMLLC, STATE:)
(:Summary: CITE:)
(:description CITE:)
(:keywords charging order
to:
(:title AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).:)
(:Summary: AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).:)
(:description AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).:)
(:keywords charging order, single member, sole member, only member, SMLLC, Louisiana:)
(:Summary: AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).:)
(:description AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).:)
(:keywords charging order, single member, sole member, only member, SMLLC, Louisiana:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Opinion]] [[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!SMLLC]] [-PAGENAME-]
to:
[[!Opinion]] [[!2020]] [[!Louisiana]] [[!SMLLC]] [-2020LouisianaAOKPropertyLateArrivingMember-]
Changed lines 9-63 from:
to:
AOK Property Investments, LLC v. Boudreaux, ___ So.3d ____, 2020 WL 7240057, 20-237 (La.App. 5 Cir. Dec. 9, 2020).
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
AOK PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC
v.
Donald J. BOUDREAUX, Jr., et al.
NO. 20-C-237
December 09, 2020
ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEW FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, NO. 72,900, DIVISION “C”, HONORABLE J. STERLING SNOWDY, JUDGE PRESIDING
Attorneys and Law Firms
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, AOK PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Todd Fontenot, Lake Charles
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RELATOR, DONALD J. BOUDREAUX, JR., Tyler J. Arbour, Ashley L. Belleau, Ryan M. Tucker
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT, SOUTHERN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, LLC, Scott Falgoust
Panel composed of Judges Marc E. Johnson, Robert A. Chaisson, and John J. Molaison, Jr.
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
PAGE_1 PAGE_PAGE_1 Relator, Donald J. Boudreaux, Jr., seeks review of the June 25, 2020 judgment that denied his motion for summary judgment, which was rendered in the 40th Judicial District Court, Division “C”. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render summary judgment in favor of Mr. Boudreaux.
According to the facts recounted by the trial court in its reasons for judgment, Mr. Boudreaux was the sole member of SCI Leasing, LLC (“SCI”), and he owned 100% of the limited liability company’s membership interest. On October 19, 2017, Mr. Boudreaux and his father, Donald Boudreaux, Sr. (“Boudreaux, Sr.”) executed an instrument transferring 5% of SCI’s membership interest to Boudreaux, Sr. On April 10, 2018, the 29th Judicial District Court rendered a judgment against Mr. Boudreaux and in favor of Respondent, AOK Property Investments, LLC (“AOK”). A few months later, on July 19, 2018, Mr. Boudreaux and Boudreaux, Sr. admitted Thomas LeBoeuf as a member with a 10% membership interest in SCI.
After the transfers were made, AOK filed its “Petition for Revocatory Action,” which sought to annul the transfers to Boudreaux, Sr. and Mr. LeBoeuf and restore Mr. Boudreaux as the sole member of SCI. The objective of restoring Mr. Boudreaux as the sole member of SCI is to seize his entire membership interest in the limited liability company (“LLC”) in satisfaction of the judgment rendered in the 29th JDC. The instant motion for summary judgment is being litgated prior to the trial on the revocatory action.
The parties limited the motion for summary judgment to one legal issue: whether a creditor is precluded by Louisiana charging order statutes from having a single-member LLC’s 100% membership interest in the LLC seized like any other non-exempt asset. The trial court found that the charging order statute is not PAGE_PAGE_2 relevant in a single-member LLC. The court reasoned that there are no other members to protect in a single-member LLC when a creditor attempts to seize the entire membership interest, and a single-member judgment-debtor’s membership interest should not be shielded from seizure by a judgment creditor.
To support its position, the trial court relied upon a Florida Supreme Court case, Olmstead v. Federal Trade Commission, 44 So.3d 76 (Fla. 2010), superseded by statute as stated in Capstone Bank v. Perry-Clinton Enterprises, LLC, 230 So.3d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017). In Olmstead, the appellate court considered a question of law certified by the United States Courts of Appeals for the 11th Circuit concerning whether, pursuant to Florida law, a court may order a judgment-debtor to surrender all “right, title, and interest” in the debtor’s single-member LLC to satisfy an outstanding judgment. The Florida court concluded that the statutory charging order provision did not preclude application of the creditor’s remedy of execution on an interest in a single-member LLC, and found that Florida law, at that time, permitted a court to order a judgment debtor to surrender all right, title, and interest in the debtor’s single-member limited liability company to satisfy an outstanding judgment. The court interpreted the language of its charging order provision, which is similar to Louisiana’s charging order provision, to not suggest that the charging order was an exclusive remedy when compared with statutes for other entities. Although Florida’s charging order provision is similar, our Louisiana Supreme Court has not interepreted Louisiana’s charging order provision in the same manner.
PAGE_2 Under Louisiana law, a member’s interest in an LLC is personal property that is separate and distinct from the property of the LLC. Channelside Servs., LLC v. Chrysochoos Grp., Inc., 15-64 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/13/16); 194 So.3d 751, 758, citing La. R.S. 12:1329. Pursuant to La. R.S. 12:1331, a court of competent jurisdiction may charge the membership interest of the LLC’s member with PAGE_PAGE_3 payment of the unsatisfied amount of judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor shall have only the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. Id. Furthermore, La. R.S. 12:1332 states that, except otherwise provided in the articles of organization or a written operating agreement, an assignee of an LLC shall not become a member or participate in the management of the LLC; and, until the assignee of an interest in an LLC becomes a member, the assignor shall continue to be a member and shall not be released from his liability to the LLC under La. R.S. 12:1322 and 1328.
According to La. R.S. 12:1330 through 1332, the assignment of a member’s interest in the LLC effectively separates the membership interest into two sets of rights: financial and management rights. Channelside Servs., LLC, 194 So.3d at 759. The assignee is granted only the member’s financial rights, while the original member retains management rights and powers, unless and until the assignee becomes a member. Id. A judgment creditor who obtains a charging order, thereby becoming an assignee of a member’s interest, is entitled to share in the profits and losses and receive the distributions to which the member was entitled. Id.
While Louisiana’s charging provision for LLCs does not contain the term “exclusive remedy,” it does provide that a judgment creditor shall have “only” the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. Consequently, that language is all that the Louisiana Legislature provided us to rely upon, and it can be viewed as the only remedy allowed to judgment creditors. This rationale can be explained by the following excerpt:
The one feature of the LLC system that poses a special issue is its treatment of creditors. Judgment creditors of an LLC member may not cause the debtor’s member’s LLC interest to be seized and sold in the ordinary way that most assets of a judgment debtor may be seized. Judgment creditors are entitled only to obtain a “charge” against an LLC member’s interest, and this charge entitles the charging creditor only to be treated as an assignee.
PAGE_PAGE_4 Glenn G. Morris, Business Organizations § 44:20, in 8 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise (2020). (Emphasis added).
Because there has been no reverse piercing of the veil in this matter, we find that a plain reading of Louisiana’s charging provision for LLCs provides the exclusive remedy of a judgment creditor. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s June 25, 2020 judgment, find that a creditor is precluded by Louisiana charging order statutes from seizing a single-member LLC’s 100% membership interest in the LLC, and grant Mr. Boudreaux’s motion for summary judgment.
WRIT GRANTED; JUDGMENT REVERSED; SUMMARY JUDGMENT RENDERED
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
AOK PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC
v.
Donald J. BOUDREAUX, Jr., et al.
NO. 20-C-237
December 09, 2020
ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEW FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, NO. 72,900, DIVISION “C”, HONORABLE J. STERLING SNOWDY, JUDGE PRESIDING
Attorneys and Law Firms
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, AOK PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Todd Fontenot, Lake Charles
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RELATOR, DONALD J. BOUDREAUX, JR., Tyler J. Arbour, Ashley L. Belleau, Ryan M. Tucker
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT, SOUTHERN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, LLC, Scott Falgoust
Panel composed of Judges Marc E. Johnson, Robert A. Chaisson, and John J. Molaison, Jr.
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
PAGE_1 PAGE_PAGE_1 Relator, Donald J. Boudreaux, Jr., seeks review of the June 25, 2020 judgment that denied his motion for summary judgment, which was rendered in the 40th Judicial District Court, Division “C”. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render summary judgment in favor of Mr. Boudreaux.
According to the facts recounted by the trial court in its reasons for judgment, Mr. Boudreaux was the sole member of SCI Leasing, LLC (“SCI”), and he owned 100% of the limited liability company’s membership interest. On October 19, 2017, Mr. Boudreaux and his father, Donald Boudreaux, Sr. (“Boudreaux, Sr.”) executed an instrument transferring 5% of SCI’s membership interest to Boudreaux, Sr. On April 10, 2018, the 29th Judicial District Court rendered a judgment against Mr. Boudreaux and in favor of Respondent, AOK Property Investments, LLC (“AOK”). A few months later, on July 19, 2018, Mr. Boudreaux and Boudreaux, Sr. admitted Thomas LeBoeuf as a member with a 10% membership interest in SCI.
After the transfers were made, AOK filed its “Petition for Revocatory Action,” which sought to annul the transfers to Boudreaux, Sr. and Mr. LeBoeuf and restore Mr. Boudreaux as the sole member of SCI. The objective of restoring Mr. Boudreaux as the sole member of SCI is to seize his entire membership interest in the limited liability company (“LLC”) in satisfaction of the judgment rendered in the 29th JDC. The instant motion for summary judgment is being litgated prior to the trial on the revocatory action.
The parties limited the motion for summary judgment to one legal issue: whether a creditor is precluded by Louisiana charging order statutes from having a single-member LLC’s 100% membership interest in the LLC seized like any other non-exempt asset. The trial court found that the charging order statute is not PAGE_PAGE_2 relevant in a single-member LLC. The court reasoned that there are no other members to protect in a single-member LLC when a creditor attempts to seize the entire membership interest, and a single-member judgment-debtor’s membership interest should not be shielded from seizure by a judgment creditor.
To support its position, the trial court relied upon a Florida Supreme Court case, Olmstead v. Federal Trade Commission, 44 So.3d 76 (Fla. 2010), superseded by statute as stated in Capstone Bank v. Perry-Clinton Enterprises, LLC, 230 So.3d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017). In Olmstead, the appellate court considered a question of law certified by the United States Courts of Appeals for the 11th Circuit concerning whether, pursuant to Florida law, a court may order a judgment-debtor to surrender all “right, title, and interest” in the debtor’s single-member LLC to satisfy an outstanding judgment. The Florida court concluded that the statutory charging order provision did not preclude application of the creditor’s remedy of execution on an interest in a single-member LLC, and found that Florida law, at that time, permitted a court to order a judgment debtor to surrender all right, title, and interest in the debtor’s single-member limited liability company to satisfy an outstanding judgment. The court interpreted the language of its charging order provision, which is similar to Louisiana’s charging order provision, to not suggest that the charging order was an exclusive remedy when compared with statutes for other entities. Although Florida’s charging order provision is similar, our Louisiana Supreme Court has not interepreted Louisiana’s charging order provision in the same manner.
PAGE_2 Under Louisiana law, a member’s interest in an LLC is personal property that is separate and distinct from the property of the LLC. Channelside Servs., LLC v. Chrysochoos Grp., Inc., 15-64 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/13/16); 194 So.3d 751, 758, citing La. R.S. 12:1329. Pursuant to La. R.S. 12:1331, a court of competent jurisdiction may charge the membership interest of the LLC’s member with PAGE_PAGE_3 payment of the unsatisfied amount of judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor shall have only the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. Id. Furthermore, La. R.S. 12:1332 states that, except otherwise provided in the articles of organization or a written operating agreement, an assignee of an LLC shall not become a member or participate in the management of the LLC; and, until the assignee of an interest in an LLC becomes a member, the assignor shall continue to be a member and shall not be released from his liability to the LLC under La. R.S. 12:1322 and 1328.
According to La. R.S. 12:1330 through 1332, the assignment of a member’s interest in the LLC effectively separates the membership interest into two sets of rights: financial and management rights. Channelside Servs., LLC, 194 So.3d at 759. The assignee is granted only the member’s financial rights, while the original member retains management rights and powers, unless and until the assignee becomes a member. Id. A judgment creditor who obtains a charging order, thereby becoming an assignee of a member’s interest, is entitled to share in the profits and losses and receive the distributions to which the member was entitled. Id.
While Louisiana’s charging provision for LLCs does not contain the term “exclusive remedy,” it does provide that a judgment creditor shall have “only” the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. Consequently, that language is all that the Louisiana Legislature provided us to rely upon, and it can be viewed as the only remedy allowed to judgment creditors. This rationale can be explained by the following excerpt:
The one feature of the LLC system that poses a special issue is its treatment of creditors. Judgment creditors of an LLC member may not cause the debtor’s member’s LLC interest to be seized and sold in the ordinary way that most assets of a judgment debtor may be seized. Judgment creditors are entitled only to obtain a “charge” against an LLC member’s interest, and this charge entitles the charging creditor only to be treated as an assignee.
PAGE_PAGE_4 Glenn G. Morris, Business Organizations § 44:20, in 8 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise (2020). (Emphasis added).
Because there has been no reverse piercing of the veil in this matter, we find that a plain reading of Louisiana’s charging provision for LLCs provides the exclusive remedy of a judgment creditor. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s June 25, 2020 judgment, find that a creditor is precluded by Louisiana charging order statutes from seizing a single-member LLC’s 100% membership interest in the LLC, and grant Mr. Boudreaux’s motion for summary judgment.
WRIT GRANTED; JUDGMENT REVERSED; SUMMARY JUDGMENT RENDERED
Added lines 1-12:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: CITE:)
(:description CITE:)
(:keywords charging order, single member, sole member, only member, SMLLC, STATE:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!Opinion]] [[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!SMLLC]] [-PAGENAME-]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
(:Summary: CITE:)
(:description CITE:)
(:keywords charging order, single member, sole member, only member, SMLLC, STATE:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!Opinion]] [[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!SMLLC]] [-PAGENAME-]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
TEXT
----