ULLCA Section 503

Site.CodeULLCASection503 History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

April 20, 2022, at 04:55 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed line 1 from:
(:title Statute ~ Main Charging Order Section 503:)
to:
(:title ULLCA Section 503:)
Changed lines 8-9 from:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
to:
Deleted lines 55-267:
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

Under this section, the judgment creditor of a member or transferee is entitled to a charging order against the relevant [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].

While in effect, that order entitles the judgment creditor to whatever [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] would otherwise be due to the member or transferee whose interest is subject to the order.

However, the judgment creditor has no say in the timing or amount of those [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

The charging order does not entitle the judgment creditor to accelerate any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] or to otherwise interfere with the management and activities of the limited liability company.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 1.

The phrase "judgment debtor" encompasses both members and transferees.

The lien pertains only to a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], which excludes "amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program." Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor's remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order). Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC's two members that "payments of $28,000 to each of them" should be treated "as expenses for wages" rather than as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]).
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 2.

Whether an application for a charging order must be served on the limited liability company, the judgment debtor, or both is a matter for other law, principally the law of remedies and civil procedure.

The order itself must be served on the limited liability company. Whether the order must also be served on the judgment debtor is a matter for other law.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 3.

If a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]. See Section 102(24) (defining [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]).
----
JayNote: Paragraph (a) is the meat of the charging order procedure. As mentioned, the charging order accomplishes two things, both of them through ¶ (a):

First, the charging order places an involuntary lien (forces the creation of a security interest) in favor of the creditor on the LLC interest of the debtor. This would normally be accomplished by the remedy of attachment.

Second, the charging order diverts [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor to the creditor. This would normally be accomplished in most states by a non-wage garnishment or an assignment order.

Well, a reader might ask, if those existing remedies will already accomplish those things, then why do we need this charging order thingy? The short answer is: We don't. The longer answer is that the charging order remedy is the result of an error in the drafting of the original Uniform Partnership Act of 1914, where the drafters of that Act lazily copied the United Kingdom's Partnership Act on this point, without realizing that the charging order was unnecessary because of existing U.S. remedies. This error then persisted to modern times, and eventually took on a life of its own to where it may be practically impossible to get rid of the charging order and just use these other remedies instead.

Now, some explanations of the phraseology used in ¶ (a):

"On application" -- The creditor must file an "Application for Charging Order" or similar and have a hearing before the court on the application, which is probably required to satisfy procedural due process for the attachment aspect of the charging order.

"by a judgment creditor" -- A charging order is exclusively a post-judgment enforcement remedy, meaning that there is no such thing as a "preliminary charging order". If a creditor desires to tie up the debtor's interest prior to trial, the relief there would be in the nature of an ordinary pre-judgment attachment.

"of a member of transferee" -- The debtor is not necessarily a member of the LLC, but may be a transferee of the member. Example: Ted is a member of Alpha LLC, and voluntarily transfers his interest to Barbara. Later, Barbara incurs a liability and suffers a judgment. Creditor can obtain a charging order against Barbara's interest.

"court may enter" -- A court is not required to enter a charging order upon application, but may in its discretion decline to do so. Suffice it to say that the situations where the court chooses to exercise its discretion not to grant the charging order should be very rare. Example: State X has a statute that provides for a $10,000 "wildcard" exemption from collection. Barbara has an LLC interest worth $2,000 and which pays a dividend of only $50 per year. Barbara asserts her wildcard exemption as to her LLC interest. The court should exercise its discretion to refuse the charging order.

"against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]" -- The creditor can take through a charging order only what the debtor has under § 502 and no more.

"of the judgment debtor" -- This is shorthand for the "member of transferee" against whom the creditor holds the judgment.

"for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment" -- The lien created by the charging order is for the amount of the unsatisfied value of the judgment, and the redirection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] is likewise limited to that amount. Can the court issue the charging order for a lesser amount? Negative, according to the plain reading on the statute (which doesn't seem to think the matter through), but there may be occasions where the creditor agrees to a lesser amount, such as where the parties have partially settled, where the court should treat this more in the nature of guidance than a firm prohibition.
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b).

Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."

Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(1).

The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order.

The principal advantage provided by this paragraph is an expanded right to information.

However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order."

For a correctly narrow reading of this provision, see Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., No. 11-1285, 2012 WL 3195759 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012).
----
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.

Creditors routinely use this provision, quite appropriately, to have a "limited purpose receiver" appointed by the court with these powers only to enforce the charging order, but then work to expand the receiver's portfolio over matters to eventually become a general-purpose receiver for the debtor's estate generally.
----
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders [[TopicsReceiverAppointment | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.

This paragraph must be understood in the context of:

(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and

(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.

EXAMPLE:

A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.

Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.

EXAMPLE:

A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].

Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.

The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.

Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.

EXAMPLE:

Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.

However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 6.

This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article] 10.

In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
----
JayNote:  As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.

Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.

For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is [[CodeForeclosure | discussed here]].

!!(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is [[CodeForeclosingSMLLC | discussed here]].
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the member or transferee.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (g)

This subsection preserves otherwise applicable exemptions but does not create any.
In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, "it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption").
----
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
----
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders [[TopicsExemption | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor's transferable interest.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

The charging order concept dates back to the English Partnership Act of 1890 and in the United States has been a fundamental part of law of unincorporated business organizations since 1914. See UPA (1914) § 28.

As much a remedy limitation as a remedy, the charging order is the sole method by which a person acting as judgment creditor of a member or transferee can extract value from the member's or transferee's ownership interest in a limited liability company. See the comment to Subsection (h).
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (h) ¶1.

This subsection does not override Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, which may provide different remedies for a secured creditor acting in that capacity.

A secured creditor with a judgment might decide to proceed under Article 9 alone, under this section alone, or under both Article 9 and this section. In the last-mentioned circumstance, the constraints of this section would apply to the charging order but not to the Article 9 remedies.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (h) ¶2.

This subsection is not intended to prevent a court from effecting a "reverse pierce" where appropriate.

In a reverse pierce, the court conflates the entity and its owner to hold the entity liable for a debt of the owner. Litchfield Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Howell, 799 A.2d 298, 312 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002) (approving a reverse pierce where a judgment debtor had established a limited liability company in a patent attempt to frustrate the judgment creditor), overruled on other grounds by, Robinson v. Coughlin, 830 A.2d 1114 (Conn. 2003).

Likewise, this subsection does not supplant fraudulent transfer law.
----
JayNote: Paragraph (h) is one of the primary reasons that LLCs and partnerships are such popular business entities, which is that the creditor's remedy is limited to a charging order. However, the enormous limitation of ¶ (h) must be realized, which is that ¶ (h) applies only and exclusively to the creditor's attempt to reach the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], which is utterly different than a creditor's attempt to access the value of the assets of the LLC. The latter may be accomplished, as the Reporter's Comment notes, through a number of theories, the most popular of which is so-called "reverse veil-piercing" (or "reverse alter ego") theories.
----
For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders [[TopicsExclusivity | click here]].
April 20, 2022, at 04:54 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added lines 35-45:

!!!Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

->Under this section, the judgment creditor of a member or transferee is entitled to a charging order against the relevant [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].

->While in effect, that order entitles the judgment creditor to whatever [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] would otherwise be due to the member or transferee whose interest is subject to the order.

->However, the judgment creditor has no say in the timing or amount of those [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

->The charging order does not entitle the judgment creditor to accelerate any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] or to otherwise interfere with the management and activities of the limited liability company.

April 20, 2022, at 04:35 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 10-12 from:
* [[ULLCASection503as1Entry|(a){1} Entry]]

* [[ULLCASection503as2Effect|(a){2}
Effect]]
to:
* [[ULLCASection503as1Entry|a Entry, Lien, Effect]]
April 20, 2022, at 04:29 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed line 14 from:
* [[ULLCASecton503b1Receiver|(b)(1) Receiver]]
to:
* [[ULLCASection503b1Receiver|(b)(1) Receiver]]
April 20, 2022, at 03:39 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 10-28 from:
* [[ULLCASection503as1Entry|a1 Entry]]

* [[ULLCASection503as2Effect|a2 Effect]]

* [[ULLCASecton503b1Receiver|b1 Receiver]]

* [[ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders|b2 Other Orders]]

* [[ULLCASection503cForeclosure|c Foreclosure]]

* [[ULLCASection503dPayJudgment|d Satisfaction]]

* [[ULLCASection503eRedemption|e Redemption]]

* [[ULLCASection503fForeclosureSMLLC|f Foreclose SMLLC]]

* [[ULLCASection503gExemptions|g Exemptions]]

* [[ULLCASection503hExclusiveRemedy|h Exclusive Remedy]]
to:
* [[ULLCASection503as1Entry|(a){1} Entry]]

* [[ULLCASection503as2Effect|(a){2} Effect]]

* [[ULLCASecton503b1Receiver|(b)(1) Receiver]]

* [[ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders|(b)(2) Other Orders]]

* [[ULLCASection503cForeclosure|(c) Foreclosure]]

* [[ULLCASection503dPayJudgment|(d) Satisfaction]]

* [[ULLCASection503eRedemption|(e) Redemption]]

* [[ULLCASection503fForeclosureSMLLC|(f) Foreclose SMLLC]]

* [[ULLCASection503gExemptions|(g) Exemptions]]

* [[ULLCASection503hExclusiveRemedy|(h) Exclusive Remedy]]
April 20, 2022, at 12:55 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
April 20, 2022, at 12:54 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
April 20, 2022, at 12:53 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added lines 10-29:
* [[ULLCASection503as1Entry|a1 Entry]]

* [[ULLCASection503as2Effect|a2 Effect]]

* [[ULLCASecton503b1Receiver|b1 Receiver]]

* [[ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders|b2 Other Orders]]

* [[ULLCASection503cForeclosure|c Foreclosure]]

* [[ULLCASection503dPayJudgment|d Satisfaction]]

* [[ULLCASection503eRedemption|e Redemption]]

* [[ULLCASection503fForeclosureSMLLC|f Foreclose SMLLC]]

* [[ULLCASection503gExemptions|g Exemptions]]

* [[ULLCASection503hExclusiveRemedy|h Exclusive Remedy]]

Changed lines 31-35 from:
Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally.

By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies. See Section 102(8) (defining "[l]imited liability company" to mean "an entity formed under this [act] or which becomes subject to this [act]") (emphasis added); see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship, A13-0562, 2013 WL 6223564, at *6 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2013) (considering the remedies available to a judgment creditor with respect to the judgment debtor's interest in a Cook Islands LLC; rejecting the debtor's argument that the creditor's "only remedy is to obtain a charging order under" [the Minnesota LLC statute]; explaining that "this argument fails because that statute only applies to Minnesota limited liability companies" which that statute "defines . . . as 'a limited liability company, other than a foreign limited liability company, organized or governed by this chapter'") (emphasis added) (statutory citations omitted).

The operating agreement has no power to alter the provisions of this section to the prejudice of third parties. Section 105(c)(15).
to:

!!!
Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

->
By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies. See Section 102(8) (defining "[l]imited liability company" to mean "an entity formed under this [act] or which becomes subject to this [act]") (emphasis added); see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship, A13-0562, 2013 WL 6223564, at *6 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2013) (considering the remedies available to a judgment creditor with respect to the judgment debtor's interest in a Cook Islands LLC; rejecting the debtor's argument that the creditor's "only remedy is to obtain a charging order under" [the Minnesota LLC statute]; explaining that "this argument fails because that statute only applies to Minnesota limited liability companies" which that statute "defines . . . as 'a limited liability company, other than a foreign limited liability company, organized or governed by this chapter'") (emphasis added) (statutory citations omitted).

->The operating agreement has no power to alter the provisions of this section to the prejudice of third parties. Section 105(c)(15).
Changed lines 39-43 from:
JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interests]], and the definition of "[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.

The effect of a charging order is to combine two traditional remedies (why we just don't use those remedies instead, I am not particularly sure), being (1) attachment of the interest, meaning that an involuntary lien in favor of the creditor is placed on the debtor's interest, and (2) a non-wage garnishment, or "assignment order" in some states, of any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] made to the debtor.

And now, a quibble with the Reporter's Comments. The Reporter writes: "By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies." What the Reporter doesn't say is that this is the result of a significant drafting flaw in the ULLCA (and also in the UPA and the ULPA), since there is utterly no reason -- and certainly no good one -- why the provisions of Article V and sections 502 and 503 in particular should not apply to foreign (out-of-state) or even alien (out-of-country) LLCs just as they would to any in-state LLCs. It is a mistake, an error, a FUBAR.
to:

!!!
JayNote

->Section
503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interests]], and the definition of "[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.

->The effect of a charging order is to combine two traditional remedies (why we just don't use those remedies instead, I am not particularly sure), being (1) attachment of the interest, meaning that an involuntary lien in favor of the creditor is placed on the debtor's interest, and (2) a non-wage garnishment, or "assignment order" in some states, of any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] made to the debtor.

->And now, a quibble with the Reporter's Comments. The Reporter writes: "By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies." What the Reporter doesn't say is that this is the result of a significant drafting flaw in the ULLCA (and also in the UPA and the ULPA), since there is utterly no reason -- and certainly no good one -- why the provisions of Article V and sections 502 and 503 in particular should not apply to foreign (out-of-state) or even alien (out-of-country) LLCs just as they would to any in-state LLCs. It is a mistake, an error, a FUBAR.
March 23, 2022, at 10:31 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 17-20 from:
JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interests]], and the definition of "distribution" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.

The effect of a charging order is to combine two traditional remedies (why we just don't use those remedies instead, I am not particularly sure), being (1) attachment of the interest, meaning that an involuntary lien in favor of the creditor is placed on the debtor's interest, and (2) a non-wage garnishment, or "assignment order" in some states, of any distributions made to the debtor.
to:
JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interests]], and the definition of "[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.

The effect of a charging order is to combine two traditional remedies (why we just don't use those remedies instead, I am not particularly sure), being (1) attachment of the interest, meaning that an involuntary lien in favor of the creditor is placed on the debtor's interest, and (2) a non-wage garnishment, or "assignment order" in some states, of any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] made to the debtor.
Changed line 25 from:
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
to:
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
Changed lines 33-37 from:
While in effect, that order entitles the judgment creditor to whatever distributions would otherwise be due to the member or transferee whose interest is subject to the order.

However, the judgment creditor has no say in the timing or amount of those distributions.

The charging order does not entitle the judgment creditor to accelerate any distributions or to otherwise interfere with the management and activities of the limited liability company.
to:
While in effect, that order entitles the judgment creditor to whatever [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] would otherwise be due to the member or transferee whose interest is subject to the order.

However, the judgment creditor has no say in the timing or amount of those [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

The charging order does not entitle the judgment creditor to accelerate any [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] or to otherwise interfere with the management and activities of the limited liability company.
Changed lines 43-45 from:
The lien pertains only to a distribution, which excludes "amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program." Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor's remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order). Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC's two members that "payments of $28,000 to each of them" should be treated "as expenses for wages" rather than as distributions).
to:
The lien pertains only to a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], which excludes "amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program." Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor's remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order). Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC's two members that "payments of $28,000 to each of them" should be treated "as expenses for wages" rather than as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]).
Changed line 55 from:
If a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]. See Section 102(24) (defining [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]).
to:
If a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]. See Section 102(24) (defining [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]).
Changed lines 61-62 from:
Second, the charging order diverts distributions from the debtor to the creditor. This would normally be accomplished in most states by a non-wage garnishment or an assignment order.
to:
Second, the charging order diverts [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor to the creditor. This would normally be accomplished in most states by a non-wage garnishment or an assignment order.
Changed line 79 from:
"for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment" -- The lien created by the charging order is for the amount of the unsatisfied value of the judgment, and the redirection of distributions is likewise limited to that amount. Can the court issue the charging order for a lesser amount? Negative, according to the plain reading on the statute (which doesn't seem to think the matter through), but there may be occasions where the creditor agrees to a lesser amount, such as where the parties have partially settled, where the court should treat this more in the nature of guidance than a firm prohibition.
to:
"for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment" -- The lien created by the charging order is for the amount of the unsatisfied value of the judgment, and the redirection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] is likewise limited to that amount. Can the court issue the charging order for a lesser amount? Negative, according to the plain reading on the statute (which doesn't seem to think the matter through), but there may be occasions where the creditor agrees to a lesser amount, such as where the parties have partially settled, where the court should treat this more in the nature of guidance than a firm prohibition.
Changed line 87 from:
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of distributions pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
to:
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
Changed line 99 from:
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the distributions subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
to:
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
Changed lines 105-106 from:
The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the distributions subject to the charging order.
to:
The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order.
Changed lines 109-110 from:
However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of distributions pursuant to a charging order."
to:
However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order."
Changed lines 113-114 from:
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the distributions, and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about distributions from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.
to:
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.
Changed lines 137-138 from:
A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for distributions.
to:
A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
Changed lines 149-150 from:
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 distribution to the member.
to:
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
Changed line 155 from:
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a distribution, because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
to:
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
Changed lines 161-165 from:
Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received distributions form the LLC.

However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.

A court might deem this salary a disguised distribution.
(In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
to:
Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.

However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].

A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]
. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
Changed lines 173-174 from:
JayNote:  As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as distributions. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara distributions, but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as distributions. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.
to:
JayNote:  As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.
Changed line 202 from:
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
to:
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
March 23, 2022, at 10:25 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 17-18 from:
JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of transferable interests, and the definition of "distribution" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.
to:
JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interests]], and the definition of "distribution" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.
Changed line 25 from:
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
to:
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
Changed lines 31-32 from:
Under this section, the judgment creditor of a member or transferee is entitled to a charging order against the relevant transferable interest.
to:
Under this section, the judgment creditor of a member or transferee is entitled to a charging order against the relevant [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
Changed line 55 from:
If a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of transferable interest. See Section 102(24) (defining transferable interest).
to:
If a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]. See Section 102(24) (defining [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]).
Changed lines 75-76 from:
"against the transferable interest" -- The creditor can take through a charging order only what the debtor has under § 502 and no more.
to:
"against the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]" -- The creditor can take through a charging order only what the debtor has under § 502 and no more.
Changed lines 147-148 from:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's transferable interest.
to:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
Changed line 155 from:
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a distribution, because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a transferable interest subject to a charging order.
to:
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a distribution, because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
Changed lines 163-164 from:
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's transferable interest, the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.
to:
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.
Changed line 193 from:
!!(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the transferable interest of the member or transferee.
to:
!!(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] of the member or transferee.
Changed line 202 from:
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's transferable interest; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's transferable interest can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
to:
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]]; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
Changed line 232 from:
JayNote: Paragraph (h) is one of the primary reasons that LLCs and partnerships are such popular business entities, which is that the creditor's remedy is limited to a charging order. However, the enormous limitation of ¶ (h) must be realized, which is that ¶ (h) applies only and exclusively to the creditor's attempt to reach the debtor's transferable interest, which is utterly different than a creditor's attempt to access the value of the assets of the LLC. The latter may be accomplished, as the Reporter's Comment notes, through a number of theories, the most popular of which is so-called "reverse veil-piercing" (or "reverse alter ego") theories.
to:
JayNote: Paragraph (h) is one of the primary reasons that LLCs and partnerships are such popular business entities, which is that the creditor's remedy is limited to a charging order. However, the enormous limitation of ¶ (h) must be realized, which is that ¶ (h) applies only and exclusively to the creditor's attempt to reach the debtor's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], which is utterly different than a creditor's attempt to access the value of the assets of the LLC. The latter may be accomplished, as the Reporter's Comment notes, through a number of theories, the most popular of which is so-called "reverse veil-piercing" (or "reverse alter ego") theories.
March 23, 2022, at 10:19 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 185-187 from:
!!(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here

!!(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here
to:
!!(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is [[CodeForeclosure | discussed here]].

!!(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is [[CodeForeclosingSMLLC | discussed here]].
March 23, 2022, at 10:15 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 1 from:
(:title Main Charging Order Section 503:)
to:
(:title Statute ~ Main Charging Order Section 503:)
March 23, 2022, at 10:15 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 179 from:
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click here
to:
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
Changed line 181 from:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here
to:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
Changed line 204 from:
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click here
to:
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders [[TopicsExemption | click here]].
Changed line 234 from:
For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders click here
to:
For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders [[TopicsExclusivity | click here]].
March 23, 2022, at 10:12 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 117 from:
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders click here
to:
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders [[TopicsReceiverAppointment | click here]].
March 23, 2022, at 10:11 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 83-84 from:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules |
 click here]].
to:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
March 23, 2022, at 10:10 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 81 from:
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click here
to:
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
Changed lines 83-84 from:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here
to:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules |
 click here]].
March 21, 2022, at 05:06 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!code]]
to:
[[!Code]] [-CodeULLCASection503-]
March 16, 2022, at 12:33 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords TEXT
:)
to:
(:title Main Charging Order Section 503:)
(:Summary: Section 503 re Charging Order.:)
(:description Section 503 re Charging Order.:)
(:keywords charging order
:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!TOPICAL]]
to:
[[!code]]
March 15, 2022, at 05:37 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 186-190 from:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
to:

!!(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here
March 15, 2022, at 05:36 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 7 from:
SECTION 503. CHARGING ORDER.
to:
!!SECTION 503. CHARGING ORDER.
Added line 22:
----
Added lines 25-27:
!!(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
Deleted lines 28-31:
(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Changed line 68 from:
----
to:
Changed line 87 from:
(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of distributions pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
to:
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of distributions pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
Changed line 99 from:
(1) appoint a receiver of the distributions subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
to:
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the distributions subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
Changed line 121 from:
(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
to:
!!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
Deleted line 128:
Changed lines 185-189 from:
(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here

(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here

(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the transferable interest of the member or transferee.
to:
!!(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here
Deleted lines 188-196:
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (g)

This subsection preserves otherwise applicable exemptions but does not create any.
In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, "it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption").
----
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's transferable interest; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's transferable interest can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
----
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click here
----
Changed lines 191-212 from:
(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor's transferable interest.
to:
!!(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the transferable interest of the member or transferee.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (g)

This subsection preserves otherwise applicable exemptions but does not create any.
In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, "it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption").
----
JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's transferable interest; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's transferable interest can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.
----
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click here
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor's transferable interest.
March 15, 2022, at 05:31 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 7-10 from:
!!SECTION 503. CHARGING ORDER.

 
to:
SECTION 503. CHARGING ORDER.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Changed lines 13-22 from:
 

By
its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies.
See Section 102(8) (defining [l]imited liability company” to mean “an entity formed under this [act] or which becomes subject to this [act]) (emphasis added); see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship, A13-0562, 2013 WL 6223564, at *6 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2013) (considering the remedies available to a judgment creditor with respect to the judgment debtor’s interest in a Cook Islands LLC; rejecting the debtor’s argument that the creditor’s “only remedy is to obtain a charging order under” [the Minnesota LLC statute]; explaining that “this argument fails because that statute only applies to Minnesota limited liability companies” which that statute “defines . . . as ‘a limited liability company, other than a foreign limited liability company, organized or governed by this chapter’”) (emphasis added) (statutory citations omitted).

The operating agreement has no power to alter the provisions of this section to the prejudice of third parties.
Section 105(c)(15).

 
to:
By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies. See Section 102(8) (defining "[l]imited liability company" to mean "an entity formed under this [act] or which becomes subject to this [act]") (emphasis added); see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship, A13-0562, 2013 WL 6223564, at *6 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2013) (considering the remedies available to a judgment creditor with respect to the judgment debtor's interest in a Cook Islands LLC; rejecting the debtor's argument that the creditor's "only remedy is to obtain a charging order under" [the Minnesota LLC statute]; explaining that "this argument fails because that statute only applies to Minnesota limited liability companies" which that statute "defines . . . as 'a limited liability company, other than a foreign limited liability company, organized or governed by this chapter'") (emphasis added) (statutory citations omitted).

The operating agreement has no power to alter the provisions of this section to the prejudice of third parties. Section 105(c)(15).
----
Deleted lines 18-19:
 
Deleted lines 20-21:
 
Changed lines 22-28 from:

 

(a)
On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor’s transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.

 
to:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
(a)
On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor's transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Deleted lines 30-31:
 
Added line 32:
Added line 34:
Added line 36:
Changed lines 38-39 from:
 
to:
----
Changed lines 41-51 from:
 

The
phrase “judgment debtor” encompasses both members and transferees.
The lien pertains only to a distribution, which excludes “amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program.
Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor’s remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order).
Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC’s two members that “payments of $28,000 to each of them” should be treated “as expenses for wages” rather than as distributions).

 
to:
The phrase "judgment debtor" encompasses both members and transferees.

The lien pertains only to a distribution, which excludes "amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program." Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor's remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order). Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC's two members that "payments of $28,000 to each of them" should be treated "as expenses for wages" rather than as distributions).
----
Deleted lines 48-49:
 
Added line 50:
Changed lines 52-53 from:
 
to:
----
Changed lines 55-61 from:
 

If
a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of transferable interest.
See Section 102(24) (defining transferable interest).

 
to:
If a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of transferable interest. See Section 102(24) (defining transferable interest).
----
Deleted lines 58-59:
 
Changed lines 60-61 from:
 
to:
Changed lines 62-63 from:
 
to:
Deleted lines 64-65:
 
Deleted lines 66-67:
 
Changed lines 68-70 from:

 
to:
----
Deleted lines 70-71:
 
Deleted lines 72-73:
 
Deleted lines 74-75:
 
Deleted lines 76-77:
 
Deleted lines 78-79:
 
Changed lines 80-92 from:

 

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click
here * * *

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here * * *

 

to:
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click
here
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
Changed lines 88-90 from:

 
to:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Changed lines 93-95 from:


Paragraph
(2) refers to “other orders” rather than “additional orders.
to:
Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."
Changed lines 96-97 from:
 
to:
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
Changed lines 100-102 from:

 
to:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Deleted lines 104-105:
 
Added line 106:
Changed lines 108-110 from:
However, that right goes no further than “the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of distributions pursuant to a charging order.
to:

However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of distributions pursuant to a charging order."
Changed lines 112-113 from:
 
to:
----
Deleted lines 114-115:
 
Changed lines 116-122 from:

 

* * * For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders click
here * * *

 

to:
----
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders click
here
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
Changed lines 122-124 from:

 
to:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Deleted lines 126-127:
 
Added lines 128-129:

Changed lines 132-135 from:
(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC’s assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court’s power to make “all other orders” is limited to “orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.

 

to:
(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
----
Deleted lines 135-136:
 
Added line 139:
Added line 141:
Changed lines 143-144 from:
 
to:
----
Deleted lines 145-146:
 
Changed lines 148-149 from:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member’s transferable interest.
to:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's transferable interest.
Changed lines 151-153 from:
The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to “give effect to the charging order.
 

to:

The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
----
Deleted lines 155-156:
 
Changed lines 157-158 from:
 
to:
----
Deleted lines 159-160:
 
Changed lines 163-165 from:
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A’s transferable interest, the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.
to:

However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's transferable interest, the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.
Changed lines 167-168 from:
 
to:
----
Deleted lines 169-170:
 
Added line 171:
Changed lines 173-174 from:
 
to:
----
Deleted lines 175-176:
 
Deleted lines 177-178:
 
Changed lines 179-197 from:

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click
here * * *

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click
here * * *

 

(c
-e) [Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here ]

 

(f) [Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here ]

 

to:
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click
here
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click
here
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(c-e) ~ Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here

(f) ~ Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here
Changed lines 191-193 from:

 
to:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Deleted lines 195-196:
 
Changed lines 197-201 from:

In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, “it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption”).

 
to:
In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, "it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption").
----
Changed lines 200-210 from:

 

* * * For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click
here ***

 

(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce
a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor’s transferable interest.

 
to:
----
For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click
here
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce a judgment against
a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor's transferable interest.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Changed lines 211-220 from:
 

The
charging order concept dates back to the English Partnership Act of 1890 and in the United States has been a fundamental part of law of unincorporated business organizations since 1914.
See UPA (1914) § 28.

As much a remedy limitation as a remedy, the charging order is the sole method by which a person acting as judgment creditor of a member or transferee can extract value from the member’s or transferee’s ownership interest in a limited liability company.
See the comment to Subsection (h).

 
to:
The charging order concept dates back to the English Partnership Act of 1890 and in the United States has been a fundamental part of law of unincorporated business organizations since 1914. See UPA (1914) § 28.

As much a remedy limitation as a remedy, the charging order is the sole method by which a person acting as judgment creditor of a member or transferee can extract value from the member's or transferee's ownership interest in a limited liability company. See the comment to Subsection (h).
----
Deleted lines 216-217:
 
Added line 218:
Changed lines 220-221 from:
 
to:
----
Changed lines 223-228 from:
 

This
subsection is not intended to prevent a court from effecting a “reverse pierce” where appropriate.
In a reverse pierce, the court conflates the entity and its owner to hold the entity liable for a debt of the owner.
Litchfield Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Howell, 799 A.2d 298, 312 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002) (approving a reverse pierce where a judgment debtor had established a limited liability company in a patent attempt to frustrate the judgment creditor), overruled on other grounds by, Robinson v. Coughlin, 830 A.2d 1114 (Conn. 2003).
to:
This subsection is not intended to prevent a court from effecting a "reverse pierce" where appropriate.

In a reverse pierce, the court conflates the entity and its owner to hold the entity liable for a debt of the owner. Litchfield Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Howell, 799 A.2d 298, 312 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002) (approving a reverse pierce where a judgment debtor had established a limited liability company in a patent attempt to frustrate the judgment creditor), overruled on other grounds by, Robinson v. Coughlin, 830 A.2d 1114 (Conn. 2003).
Changed lines 228-229 from:
 
to:
----
Changed lines 230-234 from:

 

*** For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders click
here***
to:
----
For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders click
here
----
March 15, 2022, at 03:47 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 6-327 from:
[[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!TOPICAL]]
to:
[[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!TOPICAL]]
!!SECTION 503. CHARGING ORDER.

 

Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally.

 

By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies.
See Section 102(8) (defining “[l]imited liability company” to mean “an entity formed under this [act] or which becomes subject to this [act]”) (emphasis added); see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship, A13-0562, 2013 WL 6223564, at *6 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2013) (considering the remedies available to a judgment creditor with respect to the judgment debtor’s interest in a Cook Islands LLC; rejecting the debtor’s argument that the creditor’s “only remedy is to obtain a charging order under” [the Minnesota LLC statute]; explaining that “this argument fails because that statute only applies to Minnesota limited liability companies” which that statute “defines . . . as ‘a limited liability company, other than a foreign limited liability company, organized or governed by this chapter’”) (emphasis added) (statutory citations omitted).

The operating agreement has no power to alter the provisions of this section to the prejudice of third parties.
Section 105(c)(15).

 

JayNote: Section 503 is the only section of the ULLCA that deals with charging orders. Section 503 does not, however, exist in the abstract, but must instead be carefully interpreted in accordance with its preceding § 502 which relates to transfers of transferable interests, and the definition of "distribution" found in § 102(4). Frankly, reading § 503 will make a whole lot more sense if you substantially understand those other sections first.

 

The effect of a charging order is to combine two traditional remedies (why we just don't use those remedies instead, I am not particularly sure), being (1) attachment of the interest, meaning that an involuntary lien in favor of the creditor is placed on the debtor's interest, and (2) a non-wage garnishment, or "assignment order" in some states, of any distributions made to the debtor.

 

And now, a quibble with the Reporter's Comments. The Reporter writes: "By its terms, this section does not apply to foreign limited liability companies." What the Reporter doesn't say is that this is the result of a significant drafting flaw in the ULLCA (and also in the UPA and the ULPA), since there is utterly no reason -- and certainly no good one -- why the provisions of Article V and sections 502 and 503 in particular should not apply to foreign (out-of-state) or even alien (out-of-country) LLCs just as they would to any in-state LLCs. It is a mistake, an error, a FUBAR.

 

(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, a court may enter a charging order against the transferable interest of the judgment debtor for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f), a charging order constitutes a lien on a judgment debtor’s transferable interest and requires the limited liability company to pay over to the person to which the charging order was issued any distribution that otherwise would be paid to the judgment debtor.

 

Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

 

Under this section, the judgment creditor of a member or transferee is entitled to a charging order against the relevant transferable interest.
While in effect, that order entitles the judgment creditor to whatever distributions would otherwise be due to the member or transferee whose interest is subject to the order.
However, the judgment creditor has no say in the timing or amount of those distributions.
The charging order does not entitle the judgment creditor to accelerate any distributions or to otherwise interfere with the management and activities of the limited liability company.
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 1.

 

The phrase “judgment debtor” encompasses both members and transferees.
The lien pertains only to a distribution, which excludes “amounts constituting reasonable compensation for present or past service or payments made in the ordinary course of business under a bona fide retirement plan or other bona fide benefits program.”
Section 102(4)(B).

A judgment creditor that wishes to levy on such amounts should use the appropriate creditor’s remedy, such as garnishment (which may be subject to exemptions or exclusions not relevant to a charging order).
Cf. PB Real Estate, Inc. v. Dem II Props., 719 A.2d 73, 76 (Conn. 1998) (rejecting the contention of an LLC’s two members that “payments of $28,000 to each of them” should be treated “as expenses for wages” rather than as distributions).

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 2.

 

Whether an application for a charging order must be served on the limited liability company, the judgment debtor, or both is a matter for other law, principally the law of remedies and civil procedure.
The order itself must be served on the limited liability company. Whether the order must also be served on the judgment debtor is a matter for other law.
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (a) ¶ 3.

 

If a distribution consists of rights to acquire interests in a limited liability company, the charging order applies only to those rights within the definition of transferable interest.
See Section 102(24) (defining transferable interest).

 

JayNote: Paragraph (a) is the meat of the charging order procedure. As mentioned, the charging order accomplishes two things, both of them through ¶ (a):

 

First, the charging order places an involuntary lien (forces the creation of a security interest) in favor of the creditor on the LLC interest of the debtor. This would normally be accomplished by the remedy of attachment.
 

Second, the charging order diverts distributions from the debtor to the creditor. This would normally be accomplished in most states by a non-wage garnishment or an assignment order.
 

Well, a reader might ask, if those existing remedies will already accomplish those things, then why do we need this charging order thingy? The short answer is: We don't. The longer answer is that the charging order remedy is the result of an error in the drafting of the original Uniform Partnership Act of 1914, where the drafters of that Act lazily copied the United Kingdom's Partnership Act on this point, without realizing that the charging order was unnecessary because of existing U.S. remedies. This error then persisted to modern times, and eventually took on a life of its own to where it may be practically impossible to get rid of the charging order and just use these other remedies instead.

 

Now, some explanations of the phraseology used in ¶ (a):

 

"On application" -- The creditor must file an "Application for Charging Order" or similar and have a hearing before the court on the application, which is probably required to satisfy procedural due process for the attachment aspect of the charging order.

 

"by a judgment creditor" -- A charging order is exclusively a post-judgment enforcement remedy, meaning that there is no such thing as a "preliminary charging order". If a creditor desires to tie up the debtor's interest prior to trial, the relief there would be in the nature of an ordinary pre-judgment attachment.

 

"of a member of transferee" -- The debtor is not necessarily a member of the LLC, but may be a transferee of the member. Example: Ted is a member of Alpha LLC, and voluntarily transfers his interest to Barbara. Later, Barbara incurs a liability and suffers a judgment. Creditor can obtain a charging order against Barbara's interest.

 

"court may enter" -- A court is not required to enter a charging order upon application, but may in its discretion decline to do so. Suffice it to say that the situations where the court chooses to exercise its discretion not to grant the charging order should be very rare. Example: State X has a statute that provides for a $10,000 "wildcard" exemption from collection. Barbara has an LLC interest worth $2,000 and which pays a dividend of only $50 per year. Barbara asserts her wildcard exemption as to her LLC interest. The court should exercise its discretion to refuse the charging order.

 

"against the transferable interest" -- The creditor can take through a charging order only what the debtor has under § 502 and no more.

 

"of the judgment debtor" -- This is shorthand for the "member of transferee" against whom the creditor holds the judgment.

 

"for the unsatisfied amount of the judgment" -- The lien created by the charging order is for the amount of the unsatisfied value of the judgment, and the redirection of distributions is likewise limited to that amount. Can the court issue the charging order for a lesser amount? Negative, according to the plain reading on the statute (which doesn't seem to think the matter through), but there may be occasions where the creditor agrees to a lesser amount, such as where the parties have partially settled, where the court should treat this more in the nature of guidance than a firm prohibition.

 

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click here * * *

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here * * *

 

(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of distributions pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b).

 

Paragraph (2) refers to “other orders” rather than “additional orders.”
Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
 

(1) appoint a receiver of the distributions subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(1).

 

The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the distributions subject to the charging order.
The principal advantage provided by this paragraph is an expanded right to information.
However, that right goes no further than “the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of distributions pursuant to a charging order.”
For a correctly narrow reading of this provision, see Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., No. 11-1285, 2012 WL 3195759 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012).
 

JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the distributions, and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about distributions from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.

 

Creditors routinely use this provision, quite appropriately, to have a "limited purpose receiver" appointed by the court with these powers only to enforce the charging order, but then work to expand the receiver's portfolio over matters to eventually become a general-purpose receiver for the debtor's estate generally.

 

* * * For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders click here * * *

 

(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.

 

This paragraph must be understood in the context of:
(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and

(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC’s assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court’s power to make “all other orders” is limited to “orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.”

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.

 

EXAMPLE:

A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for distributions.
The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.

 

EXAMPLE:

A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member’s transferable interest.
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 distribution to the member.
The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to “give effect to the charging order.”
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.

 

Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a distribution, because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a transferable interest subject to a charging order.
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.

 

EXAMPLE:

Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received distributions form the LLC.
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A’s transferable interest, the LLC ceases to make distributions to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former distributions.
A court might deem this salary a disguised distribution. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 6.

 

This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article] 10.
In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
 

JayNote:  As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as distributions. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara distributions, but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as distributions. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.

 

Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.

 

For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order click here * * *

 

* * * For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally click here * * *

 

(c-e) [Paragraphs (c) through (e) dealing with the foreclosure of charging order interests is discussed here ]

 

(f) [Paragraph (f) dealing with the foreclosure of a charging order lien against a Single-Member LLC is discussed here ]

 

(g) This [act] does not deprive any member or transferee of the benefit of any exemption law applicable to the transferable interest of the member or transferee.

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (g)

 

This subsection preserves otherwise applicable exemptions but does not create any.

In re Foos, 405 B.R. 604, 609 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009) (interpreting the comparable provision in UPA (1997) and stating, “it is clear that [the provision] does not create an exemption”).

 

JayNote: The debtor's exemptions will usually be found in one of two forms: first, some states have so-called "wildcard exemptions" for a certain amount, say $10,000 or so, that allow a debtor to protect that much in property from the creditor and which could apply to the debtor's transferable interest; and, second, there are federal (in the form of the Federal Wage Garnishment Law ("FWGL")) and state laws that have the effect of exempting portions of a debtor's wages, and which might apply to the creditor's interception of distributions by way of a charging order, see U.S. v. Alexander. As to the latter, note that there is a dispute among LLC planners and litigators as to whether the debtor's transferable interest can ever be considered to be in the nature of "wages", but that is a much longer discussion.

 

* * * For court opinions discussing the interplay of exemptions and charging orders click here ***

 

(h) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking in the capacity of judgment creditor to enforce a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor’s transferable interest.

 

Reporter's Comment to Section 503 generally

 

The charging order concept dates back to the English Partnership Act of 1890 and in the United States has been a fundamental part of law of unincorporated business organizations since 1914.
See UPA (1914) § 28.

As much a remedy limitation as a remedy, the charging order is the sole method by which a person acting as judgment creditor of a member or transferee can extract value from the member’s or transferee’s ownership interest in a limited liability company.
See the comment to Subsection (h).

 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (h) ¶1.

 

This subsection does not override Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, which may provide different remedies for a secured creditor acting in that capacity.
A secured creditor with a judgment might decide to proceed under Article 9 alone, under this section alone, or under both Article 9 and this section. In the last-mentioned circumstance, the constraints of this section would apply to the charging order but not to the Article 9 remedies.
 

Reporter's Comment to Subsection (h) ¶2.

 

This subsection is not intended to prevent a court from effecting a “reverse pierce” where appropriate.
In a reverse pierce, the court conflates the entity and its owner to hold the entity liable for a debt of the owner.
Litchfield Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Howell, 799 A.2d 298, 312 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002) (approving a reverse pierce where a judgment debtor had established a limited liability company in a patent attempt to frustrate the judgment creditor), overruled on other grounds by, Robinson v. Coughlin, 830 A.2d 1114 (Conn. 2003).

Likewise, this subsection does not supplant fraudulent transfer law.
 

JayNote: Paragraph (h) is one of the primary reasons that LLCs and partnerships are such popular business entities, which is that the creditor's remedy is limited to a charging order. However, the enormous limitation of ¶ (h) must be realized, which is that ¶ (h) applies only and exclusively to the creditor's attempt to reach the debtor's transferable interest, which is utterly different than a creditor's attempt to access the value of the assets of the LLC. The latter may be accomplished, as the Reporter's Comment notes, through a number of theories, the most popular of which is so-called "reverse veil-piercing" (or "reverse alter ego") theories.

 

*** For court opinions discussing the exclusivity of charging orders click here***

 
March 14, 2022, at 09:16 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added lines 1-6:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!YEAR]] [[!STATE]] [[!TOPICAL]]