Site /
Topic Abstention
Site.TopicsAbstention History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
Changed line 18 from:
** Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
to:
** [[2021OhioKerrAbsention | +]]
Added line 18:
** Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
Changed line 20 from:
!!ABSTENTION OPINIONS
to:
!!!ABSTENTION OPINIONS
Added lines 10-17:
----
----
!!!ABSTENTION ARTICLES
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/03/27/collateral-attack-on-charging-order-via-federal-court-fails-in-kerr/ | 2021.03.27]] ... Collateral Attack On Charging Order Via Federal Court Fails In Kerr
Changed lines 16-18 from:
----
Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
to:
----
Changed line 14 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Abstention list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Abstention list=normal fmt=title:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Abstention [-TopicAbstention-]
to:
[[!Topic]] Abstention [-TopicsAbstention-]
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Abstention
to:
[[!Topic]] Abstention [-TopicAbstention-]
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] [[!Abstention]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Abstention
Changed line 14 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Abstention list=normal:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!abstention]]
to:
[[!Topic]] [[!Abstention]]
Changed line 14 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:).
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:)
Changed lines 11-14 from:
ABSTENTION OPINIONS
to:
----
!!ABSTENTION OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:).
!!ABSTENTION OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:).
Changed line 2 from:
(:Summary: hCarging order and abstention:)
to:
(:Summary: Charging order and abstention:)
Changed line 4 from:
(:keywords charging order, abstyention:)
to:
(:keywords charging order, abstention:)
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:descriptionTEXT:)
(:keywords charging order,TEXT:)
(:Summary:
(:description
(:keywords charging order,
to:
(:title Topic Abstention:)
(:Summary: hCarging order and abstention:)
(:description Charging order and abstention:)
(:keywords charging order, abstyention:)
(:Summary: hCarging order and abstention:)
(:description Charging order and abstention:)
(:keywords charging order, abstyention:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!abstention]]
Changed lines 8-13 from:
[[<<]]
to:
[[<<]]
Debtors will sometimes attempt to collaterally attack charging orders by bringing actions in federal court asserting various claims, and almost invariably the federation court will dismiss the debtor's case almost immediately on some theory or another, whether one of the abstention doctrines or, as in one case I myself had, under the Federal Anti-Injunction Act, on the basis that a federal court cannot or should not interfere with a pending state court proceeding.
ABSTENTION OPINIONS
Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
Debtors will sometimes attempt to collaterally attack charging orders by bringing actions in federal court asserting various claims, and almost invariably the federation court will dismiss the debtor's case almost immediately on some theory or another, whether one of the abstention doctrines or, as in one case I myself had, under the Federal Anti-Injunction Act, on the basis that a federal court cannot or should not interfere with a pending state court proceeding.
ABSTENTION OPINIONS
Kerr v. Collier, 2021 WL 972529 (N.D.Ohio, March 16, 2021).
Added lines 1-8:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]