Site /
Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy
Site.TopicsExclusivity History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
Changed line 56 from:
!!!EXCLUSIVITY OF REMEDY OPINIONS
to:
!!!EXCLUSIVE REMEDY OPINIONS
Deleted lines 60-93:
2021.06.17 ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing
[[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Manichaean Capital, LLC v. Exela Technologies, Inc., 2021 WL 2104857 (Del.Chanc., May 25, 2021).
----
2021.01.19 ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
# [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-ramos-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2019.02.18 ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
# [[2019FloridaPansky|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-florida-pansky-charging-order.html
----
2018.09.16 ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
# [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
# [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-colorado-wilhite-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
# [[2017TexasHeckert|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-texas-heckert-charging-order.html
----
2016.09.03 … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
# [[2016TexasDevoll|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-devoll-charging-order.html
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
# [[2021CaliforniaBlizzardEnergyAlterEgoVeilPiercingExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-california-blizzard-energy-charging-order-alter-ego-veil-piercing-exclusive-remedy.html
----
Leonard v. Leonard, (N.J.Super.A.D., 2012).
# [[2012NewJerseyLeonardWritExecution|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-jersey-leonard-writ-execution-charging-order.html
----
Robert Christensen v. John Oedekoven, 95 Wy. 3 (Wyo.App., 1995).
# [[1995WyomingChristensenGarnishmentsContrasted|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-1995-wyoming-christensen-garnishments-contrasted-charging-order.html
Changed line 29 from:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy]]
to:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed lines 62-63 from:
to:
2021.06.17 ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing
[[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
[[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed lines 65-89 from:
to:
----
2021.01.19 ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
# [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-ramos-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2019.02.18 ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
# [[2019FloridaPansky|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-florida-pansky-charging-order.html
----
2018.09.16 ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
# [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
# [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-colorado-wilhite-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
# [[2017TexasHeckert|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-texas-heckert-charging-order.html
----
2016.09.03 … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
# [[2016TexasDevoll|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-devoll-charging-order.html
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
# [[2021CaliforniaBlizzardEnergyAlterEgoVeilPiercingExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-california-blizzard-energy-charging-order-alter-ego-veil-piercing-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2021.01.19 ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
# [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-ramos-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2019.02.18 ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
# [[2019FloridaPansky|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-florida-pansky-charging-order.html
----
2018.09.16 ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
# [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
# [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-colorado-wilhite-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
# [[2017TexasHeckert|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-texas-heckert-charging-order.html
----
2016.09.03 … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
# [[2016TexasDevoll|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-devoll-charging-order.html
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
# [[2021CaliforniaBlizzardEnergyAlterEgoVeilPiercingExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-california-blizzard-energy-charging-order-alter-ego-veil-piercing-exclusive-remedy.html
----
Changed lines 91-92 from:
to:
# [[2012NewJerseyLeonardWritExecution|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-jersey-leonard-writ-execution-charging-order.html
----
----
Added line 94:
# [[1995WyomingChristensenGarnishmentsContrasted|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-1995-wyoming-christensen-garnishments-contrasted-charging-order.html
Added lines 25-26:
** [[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed lines 29-30 from:
** Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
to:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy]]
Added lines 37-38:
** [[2019FloridaPansky|+]]
Added lines 41-42:
** [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]]
Changed lines 45-46 from:
** U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
to:
** [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]]
Added lines 49-50:
** [[2017TexasHeckert|+]]
Changed line 53 from:
** Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
to:
** [[2016TexasDevoll|+]]
Changed lines 29-31 from:
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs
** Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).
to:
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Grengs
** [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy | +]]
** [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed line 21 from:
** Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore, 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
to:
** [[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | +]]
Added lines 20-21:
** Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore, 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
Added line 14:
Added lines 16-45:
!!!EXCLUSIVE REMEDY ARTICLES
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2022/02/24/tenth-circuit-nukes-charging-order-exclusivity-in-earthgrains | 2022.02.24]] ... Tenth Circuit Nukes Charging Order Exclusivity In EarthGrains
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/06/17/delaware-chancery-court-navigates-around-charging-order-exclusivity-and-recognizes-reverse-veil-piercing/ | 2021.06.17]] ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/01/19/equitable-remedy-to-circumvent-charging-order-exclusivity-denied-in-ramos/ | 2021.01.19]] ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
** Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs
** Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2019/02/18/florida-order-awarding-llc-interest-to-creditor-reversed-in-pansky/ | 2019.02.18]] ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
* [[https://goo.gl/g2gprW | 2018.09.16]] ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
* [[https://goo.gl/EHJ2bN | 2017.11.23]] ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
** U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
* [[https://goo.gl/HYn2F7 | 2017.11.23]] ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2016/09/04/charging-order-exclusivity-proves-to-be-not-so-exclusive-in-devoll/ | 2016.09.03]] … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
** Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Deleted lines 54-61:
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity [-TopicsExclusivity-]
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusive_Remedy [-TopicsExclusivity-]
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal fmt:title:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusive_Remedy list=normal fmt:title:)
Deleted lines 19-22:
[[2022GeorgiaMcLeodExclusivity | McLeod v. Bruce]], 2022 WL 731517 (M.D.Ga., March 10, 2022).
[[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore]], 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal fmt:title:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity [-TopicsExclusivity-]
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!exclusivity]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.exclusivity list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal:)
Added lines 9-13:
The phrase "exclusive remedy" as found in § 503(h) has caused considerable confusion. This is largely because the term "remedy" is a statutory term-of-art that normally refers to a list of enumerated remedies in a particular state's judgment enforcement laws, but is misinterpreted to mean something like "exclusive outcome" — which isn't the same thing.
A problem is that what constitutes a "remedy" varies from state to state, and there are other avenues of a creditor to obtain relief (such as reverse veil piercing or fraudulent transfer actions) that may or may not considered to be a "remedy". Thus, there may avenues of relief that are desired for creditors to access, but which may be off-limits because of the phrase, and there may be avenues of relief that are undesirable for creditors to access that are available to creditors because they are not technically "remedies".
Thus, it is suggested that consideration be given to using some other phrase than "exclusive remedy" in the text of § 503(h).
A problem is that what constitutes a "remedy" varies from state to state, and there are other avenues of a creditor to obtain relief (such as reverse veil piercing or fraudulent transfer actions) that may or may not considered to be a "remedy". Thus, there may avenues of relief that are desired for creditors to access, but which may be off-limits because of the phrase, and there may be avenues of relief that are undesirable for creditors to access that are available to creditors because they are not technically "remedies".
Thus, it is suggested that consideration be given to using some other phrase than "exclusive remedy" in the text of § 503(h).
Added lines 24-39:
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
Manichaean Capital, LLC v. Exela Technologies, Inc., 2021 WL 2104857 (Del.Chanc., May 25, 2021).
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
Leonard v. Leonard, (N.J.Super.A.D., 2012).
Robert Christensen v. John Oedekoven, 95 Wy. 3 (Wyo.App., 1995).
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:descriptionTEXT:)
(:keywords charging order,TEXT:)
(:Summary:
(:description
(:keywords charging order,
to:
(:title Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:Summary: Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:description Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:keywords charging order, exclusivity, exclusive, remedy, exclusive remedy:)
(:Summary: Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:description Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:keywords charging order, exclusivity, exclusive, remedy, exclusive remedy:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!exclusivity]]
Added lines 9-15:
----
!!!EXCLUSIVITY OF REMEDY OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.exclusivity list=normal:)
----
!!!EXCLUSIVITY OF REMEDY OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.exclusivity list=normal:)
----
Changed lines 1-8 from:
to:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
Added lines 1-4:
[[2022GeorgiaMcLeodExclusivity | McLeod v. Bruce]], 2022 WL 731517 (M.D.Ga., March 10, 2022).
[[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore]], 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).