Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy

Site.TopicsExclusivity History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

March 27, 2022, at 04:42 PM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed line 56 from:
!!!EXCLUSIVITY OF REMEDY OPINIONS
to:
!!!EXCLUSIVE REMEDY OPINIONS
March 27, 2022, at 05:40 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Deleted lines 60-93:

2021.06.17 ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing
[[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Manichaean Capital, LLC v. Exela Technologies, Inc., 2021 WL 2104857 (Del.Chanc., May 25, 2021).
----
2021.01.19 ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
# [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-ramos-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2019.02.18 ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
# [[2019FloridaPansky|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-florida-pansky-charging-order.html
----
2018.09.16 ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
# [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
# [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-colorado-wilhite-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
# [[2017TexasHeckert|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-texas-heckert-charging-order.html
----
2016.09.03 … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
# [[2016TexasDevoll|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-devoll-charging-order.html
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
# [[2021CaliforniaBlizzardEnergyAlterEgoVeilPiercingExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-california-blizzard-energy-charging-order-alter-ego-veil-piercing-exclusive-remedy.html
----
Leonard v. Leonard, (N.J.Super.A.D., 2012).
# [[2012NewJerseyLeonardWritExecution|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-jersey-leonard-writ-execution-charging-order.html
----
Robert Christensen v. John Oedekoven, 95 Wy. 3 (Wyo.App., 1995).
# [[1995WyomingChristensenGarnishmentsContrasted|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-1995-wyoming-christensen-garnishments-contrasted-charging-order.html
March 27, 2022, at 03:13 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed line 29 from:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy]]
to:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy | +]]
March 27, 2022, at 03:04 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 62-63 from:
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
to:
2021.06.17 ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing
[[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed lines 65-89 from:
to:
----
2021.01.19 ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos
Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
# [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-ramos-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----
2019.02.18 ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky
# [[2019FloridaPansky|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-florida-pansky-charging-order.html
----
2018.09.16 ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square
# [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite
U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
# [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-colorado-wilhite-charging-order.html
----
2017.11.23 ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert
# [[2017TexasHeckert|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2017-texas-heckert-charging-order.html
----
2016.09.03 … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll
# [[2016TexasDevoll|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-devoll-charging-order.html
Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
----
Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).
# [[2021CaliforniaBlizzardEnergyAlterEgoVeilPiercingExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-california-blizzard-energy-charging-order-alter-ego-veil-piercing-exclusive-remedy.html
----
Changed lines 91-92 from:
to:
# [[2012NewJerseyLeonardWritExecution|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-jersey-leonard-writ-execution-charging-order.html
----
Added line 94:
# [[1995WyomingChristensenGarnishmentsContrasted|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-1995-wyoming-christensen-garnishments-contrasted-charging-order.html
March 27, 2022, at 03:03 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added lines 25-26:
** [[2021DelawareManichaeanExclusiveRemedy | +]]
Changed lines 29-30 from:
** Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).
to:
** [[2021FloridaRamosExclusiveRemedy]]
Added lines 37-38:
** [[2019FloridaPansky|+]]
Added lines 41-42:
** [[2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquare|+]]
Changed lines 45-46 from:
** U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).
to:
** [[2017ColoradoWilhite|+]]
Added lines 49-50:
** [[2017TexasHeckert|+]]
Changed line 53 from:
** Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
to:
** [[2016TexasDevoll|+]]
March 27, 2022, at 02:34 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 29-31 from:
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs

** Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).
to:
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Grengs

** [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy | +]]
March 24, 2022, at 04:21 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 21 from:
** Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore, 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
to:
** [[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | +]]
March 24, 2022, at 04:20 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added lines 20-21:

** Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore, 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
March 24, 2022, at 04:19 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added line 14:
Added lines 16-45:

!!!EXCLUSIVE REMEDY ARTICLES

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2022/02/24/tenth-circuit-nukes-charging-order-exclusivity-in-earthgrains | 2022.02.24]] ... Tenth Circuit Nukes Charging Order Exclusivity In EarthGrains

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/06/17/delaware-chancery-court-navigates-around-charging-order-exclusivity-and-recognizes-reverse-veil-piercing/ | 2021.06.17]] ... Delaware Chancery Court Navigates Around Charging Order Exclusivity And Recognizes Reverse Veil-Piercing

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/01/19/equitable-remedy-to-circumvent-charging-order-exclusivity-denied-in-ramos/ | 2021.01.19]] ... Equitable Remedy To Circumvent Charging Order Exclusivity Denied In Ramos

** Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs

** Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2019/02/18/florida-order-awarding-llc-interest-to-creditor-reversed-in-pansky/ | 2019.02.18]] ... Florida Order Awarding LLC Interest To Creditor Reversed In Pansky

* [[https://goo.gl/g2gprW | 2018.09.16]] ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square

* [[https://goo.gl/EHJ2bN | 2017.11.23]] ... FDCPA Overrides State Law Limitations Period And Charging Order Exclusivity In Wilhite

** U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).

* [[https://goo.gl/HYn2F7 | 2017.11.23]] ... Charging Order Not Exclusive Remedy For SMLLC Interest In Heckert

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2016/09/04/charging-order-exclusivity-proves-to-be-not-so-exclusive-in-devoll/ | 2016.09.03]] … Charging Order Exclusivity Proves To Be Not So Exclusive In DeVoll

** Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).

----
Deleted lines 54-61:

Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).

Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).

U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).

Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).
March 23, 2022, at 01:50 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity [-TopicsExclusivity-]
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusive_Remedy [-TopicsExclusivity-]
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal fmt:title:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusive_Remedy list=normal fmt:title:)
March 22, 2022, at 02:39 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Deleted lines 19-22:

[[2022GeorgiaMcLeodExclusivity | McLeod v. Bruce]], 2022 WL 731517 (M.D.Ga., March 10, 2022).

[[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore]], 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).
March 22, 2022, at 02:38 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal fmt:title:)
March 22, 2022, at 12:57 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity [-TopicsExclusivity-]
March 20, 2022, at 12:52 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!exclusivity]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Exclusivity
Changed line 17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.exclusivity list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Exclusivity list=normal:)
March 19, 2022, at 04:40 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added lines 9-13:
The phrase "exclusive remedy" as found in § 503(h) has caused considerable confusion. This is largely because the term "remedy" is a statutory term-of-art that normally refers to a list of enumerated remedies in a particular state's judgment enforcement laws, but is misinterpreted to mean something like "exclusive outcome" — which isn't the same thing.

A problem is that what constitutes a "remedy" varies from state to state, and there are other avenues of a creditor to obtain relief (such as reverse veil piercing or fraudulent transfer actions) that may or may not considered to be a "remedy". Thus, there may avenues of relief that are desired for creditors to access, but which may be off-limits because of the phrase, and there may be avenues of relief that are undesirable for creditors to access that are available to creditors because they are not technically "remedies".

Thus, it is suggested that consideration be given to using some other phrase than "exclusive remedy" in the text of § 503(h).
Added lines 24-39:

Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. Schaefers, 2021 WL 5366815 (Cal.App., Distr. 6, Nov. 18, 2021).

Manichaean Capital, LLC v. Exela Technologies, Inc., 2021 WL 2104857 (Del.Chanc., May 25, 2021).

Ramos v. Mississippi Real Estate Dispositions, LLC, 2021 WL 112763 (Fla.App., Jan. 13. 2021).

Grengs v. Grengs, 2020 ND 242, 2020 WL 6793355 (N.D., Nov. 19, 2020).

U.S. v. Wilhite, 2017 WL 5517410 (D.Colo., Nov. 17, 2017).

Devoll v. Demonbreun, 2016 WL 4538805 (Tex.App., Aug. 31, 2016).

Leonard v. Leonard, (N.J.Super.A.D., 2012).

Robert Christensen v. John Oedekoven, 95 Wy. 3 (Wyo.App., 1995).
March 19, 2022, at 04:25 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
to:
(:title Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:Summary: Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:description Exclusivity Of Charging Order Remedy:)
(:keywords charging order, exclusivity, exclusive, remedy, exclusive remedy:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!exclusivity]]
Added lines 9-15:
----
!!!EXCLUSIVITY OF REMEDY OPINIONS

(:pagelist link=Category.exclusivity list=normal:)

----

March 17, 2022, at 04:44 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 1-8 from:
to:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
March 17, 2022, at 04:38 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added lines 1-4:

[[2022GeorgiaMcLeodExclusivity | McLeod v. Bruce]], 2022 WL 731517 (M.D.Ga., March 10, 2022).

[[2022UtahEarthgrainsBakingReceiverExclusivity | Earthgrains Baking Co., v. Sycamore]], 2022 WL 433486 (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2022).