Site /
Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery
Site.TopicsInformationRightsDiscovery History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
March 28, 2022, at 09:54 PM
by - Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery
Changed lines 21-62 from:
Succession of McCalmont, 2018 WL 6521176 (La.App., Cir. 3, Dec. 12, 2018).
# [[2018LouisianaMcCalmont|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-louisiana-mccalmont-charging-order.html
----
----
GenX Processors Mauritius Ltd. v. Jackson, 2018 WL 5777485 (D.Nev., Nov. 2, 2018).
# [[2018NevadaGenX|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-nevada-genx-charging-order.html
----
----
Dream Games v. PC Onsite LLC, 2016 WL 1554978 (D. Ariz., 2016).
# [[2016ArizonaDreamGames|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-arizona-dream-games-charging-order.html
----
----
Mack Film Development, LLC v. Benevolent Partners, L.P., 2014 WL 929702 (Conn.Super., Fairfield, Feb. 6, 2014).
# [[2014ConnecticutMackFilm|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-connecticut-mack-film-charging-order.html
----
----
In re Boone County Utilities, LLC, Adv.Proc. No. 12-50128 (Bk.S.D.In., Sept. 17, 2014).
# [[2014IndianaBooneCountyUtilitiesDiscovery|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-indiana-boone-county-utilities-discovery-charging-order.html
----
----
Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 21, 2013 WL 1349284 (Nev., April 4, 2013).
# [[2013NevadaRockBay|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-nevada-rock-bay-charging-order.html
----
----
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., 2012 WL 3195759 (Table) (Iowa App., Slip Copy, Table, Aug. 2012).
# [[2012IowaWellsFargo|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-iowa-wells-fargo-charging-order.html
----
----
Wong v. Yoo, No. 04-CV-4569 (E.D.N.Y., July 20, 2012).
# [[2012NewYorkWongDiscovery|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-york-wong-discovery-charging-order.html
----
----
Sanders v. Ohmite Holding, LLC, 2011 WL 598436 (Del.Ch., Unpublished, Feb. 21, 2011).
[[2011DelawareSanders | +]]
to:
Added line 21:
Changed lines 23-26 from:
to:
# [[2018LouisianaMcCalmont|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-louisiana-mccalmont-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 28-31 from:
to:
# [[2018NevadaGenX|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-nevada-genx-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 33-36 from:
to:
# [[2016ArizonaDreamGames|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-arizona-dream-games-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 38-41 from:
to:
# [[2014ConnecticutMackFilm|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-connecticut-mack-film-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 43-46 from:
to:
# [[2014IndianaBooneCountyUtilitiesDiscovery|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-indiana-boone-county-utilities-discovery-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 48-51 from:
to:
# [[2013NevadaRockBay|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-nevada-rock-bay-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 53-56 from:
to:
# [[2012IowaWellsFargo|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-iowa-wells-fargo-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 58-59 from:
to:
# [[2012NewYorkWongDiscovery|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-new-york-wong-discovery-charging-order.html
----
----
Sanders v. Ohmite Holding, LLC, 2011 WL 598436 (Del.Ch., Unpublished, Feb. 21, 2011).
[[2011DelawareSanders | +]]
----
----
Sanders v. Ohmite Holding, LLC, 2011 WL 598436 (Del.Ch., Unpublished, Feb. 21, 2011).
[[2011DelawareSanders | +]]
March 28, 2022, at 08:08 PM
by - Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery
Changed line 18 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Information_Rights list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Information_Rights list=normal fmt=title:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Information_Rights
to:
[[!Topic]] Information_Rights [-TopicsInformationRightsDiscovery-]
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] Information_Rights
to:
[[!Topic]] Information_Rights
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!informationrights]]
to:
[[!topic]] Information_Rights
Changed line 18 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.informationrights list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Information_Rights list=normal:)
Changed lines 21-37 from:
to:
Succession of McCalmont, 2018 WL 6521176 (La.App., Cir. 3, Dec. 12, 2018).
GenX Processors Mauritius Ltd. v. Jackson, 2018 WL 5777485 (D.Nev., Nov. 2, 2018).
Dream Games v. PC Onsite LLC, 2016 WL 1554978 (D. Ariz., 2016).
Mack Film Development, LLC v. Benevolent Partners, L.P., 2014 WL 929702 (Conn.Super., Fairfield, Feb. 6, 2014).
In re Boone County Utilities, LLC, Adv.Proc. No. 12-50128 (Bk.S.D.In., Sept. 17, 2014).
Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 21, 2013 WL 1349284 (Nev., April 4, 2013).
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., 2012 WL 3195759 (Table) (Iowa App., Slip Copy, Table, Aug. 2012).
Wong v. Yoo, No. 04-CV-4569 (E.D.N.Y., July 20, 2012).
Sanders v. Ohmite Holding, LLC, 2011 WL 598436 (Del.Ch., Unpublished, Feb. 21, 2011).
GenX Processors Mauritius Ltd. v. Jackson, 2018 WL 5777485 (D.Nev., Nov. 2, 2018).
Dream Games v. PC Onsite LLC, 2016 WL 1554978 (D. Ariz., 2016).
Mack Film Development, LLC v. Benevolent Partners, L.P., 2014 WL 929702 (Conn.Super., Fairfield, Feb. 6, 2014).
In re Boone County Utilities, LLC, Adv.Proc. No. 12-50128 (Bk.S.D.In., Sept. 17, 2014).
Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 21, 2013 WL 1349284 (Nev., April 4, 2013).
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., 2012 WL 3195759 (Table) (Iowa App., Slip Copy, Table, Aug. 2012).
Wong v. Yoo, No. 04-CV-4569 (E.D.N.Y., July 20, 2012).
Sanders v. Ohmite Holding, LLC, 2011 WL 598436 (Del.Ch., Unpublished, Feb. 21, 2011).
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:Summary:
(:description TEXT
(:
to:
(:title Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery:)
(:Summary: Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery:)
(:description Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery:)
(:keywords charging order, discovery, information, right:)
(:Summary: Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery:)
(:description Charging Order Information Rights And Discovery:)
(:keywords charging order, discovery, information, right:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!informationrights]]
Changed lines 9-14 from:
to:
The courts have struggled to determine what information that a creditor holding a charging order is entitled to, though usually end up with the correct decision.
This can be fixed by an expanded Comment noting that a creditor as a mere lienholder (or even as a involuntary assignee after foreclosure) has no rights in that capacity against the entity.
However, a creditor normally in judgment enforcement proceedings is entitled to whatever information the debtor receives about the debtor's investment, which would mean information that the debtor receives from the entity, i.e., if the debtor can obtain information from the entity, the debtor must do so and then turn that information over to the creditor pursuant to the creditor's appropriate discovery request or at a debtor's examination. If this information requires particular confidentiality for the entity — say, the D/M is the CFO of the company — then protective orders or the appointment of a receiver would be appropriate.
This can be fixed by an expanded Comment noting that a creditor as a mere lienholder (or even as a involuntary assignee after foreclosure) has no rights in that capacity against the entity.
However, a creditor normally in judgment enforcement proceedings is entitled to whatever information the debtor receives about the debtor's investment, which would mean information that the debtor receives from the entity, i.e., if the debtor can obtain information from the entity, the debtor must do so and then turn that information over to the creditor pursuant to the creditor's appropriate discovery request or at a debtor's examination. If this information requires particular confidentiality for the entity — say, the D/M is the CFO of the company — then protective orders or the appointment of a receiver would be appropriate.
Changed lines 16-18 from:
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
(:pagelist link=Category.
to:
!!!INFORMATION RIGHTS AND DISCOVERY OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.informationrights list=normal:)
(:pagelist link=Category.informationrights list=normal:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
Changed lines 8-16 from:
[[<<]]
to:
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
Added lines 1-8:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]