Site /
Charging Order Procedure
Site.TopicsProcedureRules History
Show minor edits - Show changes to output
Changed lines 67-111 from:
2020.04.30 ... Charging Order Denied For Lack Of Proof Of The Debtor's Interest In Dhillon
# [[2020CaliforniaPerezUnknownInterests|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-california-perez-unknown-interests-charging-order.html Perez v. Dhillon, 2020 WL 1900447 (E.D.Cal., April 17, 2020).
----
----
2020.02.29 ... Florida Charging Order Requires Distributions To Be Re-Directed To The Creditor In Kostoglou
# [[2020FloridaKostoglouDistributions|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-florida-kostoglou-distributions-charging-order.html
----
----
2015.10.18 ... Charging Order Procedural Issues Confronted in Textron Financial
Textron Financial Corp. v. Gallegos, C.D.Cal. Case No. 15cv1678 (Oct. 7, 2015).
# [[2015CaliforniaTextronFinancial|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-california-textron-financial-charging-order.html
----
----
Ilani v. Abraham, D.Nev. Case No. 2:17-CV-692 (Aug. 21, 2018).
# [[2018NevadaIlani|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-nevada-ilani-charging-order.html
----
----
Brown v. Sperber-Porter, 2018 WL 4184372 (D.Ariz., Aug. 24, 2018).
# [[2018ArizonaBrown|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-arizona-brown-charging-order.html
----
----
Kearney Construction Co., LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 2015 WL 1499155 (M.D. Fla., 2015).
# [[2015FloridaKearneyConstructionProcedure|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-florida-kearney-construction-procedure-charging-order.html
----
----
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Unified Recovery Group, LLC, 2014 WL 5846388 (S.D.Ala., 2014).
# [[2014AlabamaSEPropertyProcedure|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-alabama-se-property-procedure-charging-order.html
----
----
Regions Bank v. Stewart, 2011 WL 1827453 (S.D.Ala., 2011).
# [[2011AlabamaRegionsBankNoNoticeToEntity|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2011-alabama-regions-bank-no-notice-to-entity-charging-order.html
----
----
Open Road Trucking, LLC v. Swanson, 2019 WL 6768443 (N.D., Dec. 12, 2009).
# [[2019NorthDakotaOpenRoad|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-north-dakota-open-road-charging-order.html
to:
Added lines 51-52:
** [[2020CaliforniaPerezUnknownInterests|+]]
Added lines 55-56:
** [[2020FloridaKostoglouDistributions|+]]
Added lines 58-59:
** [[2015CaliforniaTextronFinancial|+]]
Changed lines 61-64 from:
Brown v. Sperber-Porter, 2018 WL 4184372 (D.Ariz., Aug. 24, 2018)
to:
2020.04.30 ... Charging Order Denied For Lack Of Proof Of The Debtor's Interest In Dhillon
# [[2020CaliforniaPerezUnknownInterests|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-california-perez-unknown-interests-charging-order.html Perez v. Dhillon, 2020 WL 1900447 (E.D.Cal., April 17, 2020).
----
----
2020.02.29 ... Florida Charging Order Requires Distributions To Be Re-Directed To The Creditor In Kostoglou
# [[2020FloridaKostoglouDistributions|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-florida-kostoglou-distributions-charging-order.html
----
----
2015.10.18 ... Charging Order Procedural Issues Confronted in Textron Financial
Changed lines 74-87 from:
to:
# [[2015CaliforniaTextronFinancial|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-california-textron-financial-charging-order.html
----
----
Ilani v. Abraham, D.Nev. Case No. 2:17-CV-692 (Aug. 21, 2018).
# [[2018NevadaIlani|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-nevada-ilani-charging-order.html
----
----
Brown v. Sperber-Porter, 2018 WL 4184372 (D.Ariz., Aug. 24, 2018).
# [[2018ArizonaBrown|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-arizona-brown-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Ilani v. Abraham, D.Nev. Case No. 2:17-CV-692 (Aug. 21, 2018).
# [[2018NevadaIlani|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-nevada-ilani-charging-order.html
----
----
Brown v. Sperber-Porter, 2018 WL 4184372 (D.Ariz., Aug. 24, 2018).
# [[2018ArizonaBrown|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-arizona-brown-charging-order.html
----
----
Changed lines 89-92 from:
to:
# [[2015FloridaKearneyConstructionProcedure|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-florida-kearney-construction-procedure-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 94-97 from:
to:
# [[2014AlabamaSEPropertyProcedure|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-alabama-se-property-procedure-charging-order.html
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 99-100 from:
to:
# [[2011AlabamaRegionsBankNoNoticeToEntity|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2011-alabama-regions-bank-no-notice-to-entity-charging-order.html
----
----
Open Road Trucking, LLC v. Swanson, 2019 WL 6768443 (N.D., Dec. 12, 2009).
# [[2019NorthDakotaOpenRoad|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-north-dakota-open-road-charging-order.html
----
----
Open Road Trucking, LLC v. Swanson, 2019 WL 6768443 (N.D., Dec. 12, 2009).
# [[2019NorthDakotaOpenRoad|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2019-north-dakota-open-road-charging-order.html
Changed lines 11-12 from:
to:
by way of example, the simple California procedure follows:
Added lines 44-54:
----
!!!PROCEDURE ARTICLES
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/04/30/charging-order-denied-for-lack-of-proof-of-the-debtors-interest-in-dhillon/ | 2020.04.30]] ... Charging Order Denied For Lack Of Proof Of The Debtor's Interest In Dhillon
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/02/29/florida-charging-order-requires-distributions-to-be-re-directed-to-the-creditor-in-kostoglou/ | 2020.02.29]] ... Florida Charging Order Requires Distributions To Be Re-Directed To The Creditor In Kostoglou
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2015/10/18/charging-order-procedural-issues-confronted-in-textron-financial/ | 2015.10.18]] ... Charging Order Procedural Issues Confronted in Textron Financial
Changed line 47 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Procedure list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Procedure list=normal fmt=title:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Procedure
to:
[[!Topic]] Procedure [-TopicsProcedureRules-]
Changed lines 15-16 from:
CCP § 708.310.
to:
'''CCP § 708.310.'''
Changed line 21 from:
CCP § 708.320.
to:
'''CCP § 708.320.'''
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:descriptionTEXT:)
(:keywords charging order,TEXT:)
(:Summary:
(:description
(:keywords charging order,
to:
(:title Charging Order Procedure:)
(:Summary: Charging Order Procedure:)
(:description Charging Order Procedure:)
(:keywords charging order, procedure, rule:)
(:Summary: Charging Order Procedure:)
(:description Charging Order Procedure:)
(:keywords charging order, procedure, rule:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Procedure
Changed lines 9-12 from:
to:
One of the biggest flaws with the charging orders is that, except for California, the states have not enacting coordinating procedures in their Enforcement of Judgments Laws. This has forced courts nationwide to consider motions for charging orders on an ad hoc basis — quite literally, making up the procedure as they go.
The simple California procedure follows:
The simple California procedure follows:
Changed lines 14-17 from:
(:pagelist link=Category
to:
CCP § 708.310.
If a money judgment is rendered against a partner or member but not against the partnership or limited liability company, the judgment debtor’s interest in the partnership or limited liability company may be applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment by an order charging the judgment debtor’s interest pursuant to Section 15907.3, 16504, or 17705.03 of the Corporations Code.
Changed lines 20-62 from:
to:
CCP § 708.320.
(a) A lien on a judgment debtor’s interest in a partnership or limited liability company is created by service of a notice of motion for a charging order on the judgment debtor and on either of the following:
(1) All partners or the partnership.
(2) All members or the limited liability company.
(b) If a charging order is issued, the lien created pursuant to subdivision (a) continues under the terms of the order. If issuance of the charging order is denied, the lien is extinguished.
----
While simple, the California procedure thus provides for the following:
1. A noticed motion for charging order;
2. Service both upon the D/M and the target entity;
3. A temporary lien created upon service of the motion (analogous to a lien being created on an asset that is the subject of a levy); and
4. The lien becomes permanent if the motion for charging order is granted, or the lien is extinguished if not.
At least these provisions should be incorporated into the Harmonized Acts. Arguably, there should also be a provision allowing a creditor to obtain a charging order on an ex parte basis, without notice to the D/M or the entity, where there is a showing that the D/M may attempt to transfer the interest before service is made.
----
!!!PROCEDURE OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.Procedure list=normal:)
----
Ilani v. Abraham, D.Nev. Case No. 2:17-CV-692 (Aug. 21, 2018).
Brown v. Sperber-Porter, 2018 WL 4184372 (D.Ariz., Aug. 24, 2018).
Textron Financial Corp. v. Gallegos, C.D.Cal. Case No. 15cv1678 (Oct. 7, 2015).
Kearney Construction Co., LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 2015 WL 1499155 (M.D. Fla., 2015).
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Unified Recovery Group, LLC, 2014 WL 5846388 (S.D.Ala., 2014).
Regions Bank v. Stewart, 2011 WL 1827453 (S.D.Ala., 2011).
Open Road Trucking, LLC v. Swanson, 2019 WL 6768443 (N.D., Dec. 12, 2009).
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
Changed lines 8-16 from:
[[<<]]
to:
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
Added lines 1-8:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]