Site /
ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders
Site.ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
Changed line 79 from:
->For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
to:
->For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see [[2018OregonLawZemp|Law v. Zemp]].
Changed line 11 from:
(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
to:
[[ULLCASection503b1Receiver|(1)]] appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
Changed line 6 from:
Other_Orders [[!Code]] [--ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders--]]
to:
Other_Orders [[!Code]] [--ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders--]
Changed line 32 from:
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.
to:
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.
Changed line 11 from:
to:
(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
Deleted lines 43-56:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
->Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
Changed lines 46-47 from:
to:
->A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
->Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
->The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
->Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
->''EXAMPLE:''
->Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.
->Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
->The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
->Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
->''EXAMPLE:''
->Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.
Added line 81:
Changed line 83 from:
to:
Changed line 88 from:
!!OTHER ORDERS OPINIONS
to:
!!!OTHER ORDERS OPINIONS
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
TEXT:)
:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:
to:
(:title ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders:)
(:Summary: ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders:)
(:description ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders:)
(:keywords charging order, ancillary, form:)
(:Summary: ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders:)
(:description ULLCA 503(b)(2) Other Orders:)
(:keywords charging order, ancillary, form:)
Changed line 6 from:
to:
Other_Orders [[!Code]] [--ULLCASection503b2OtherOrders--]]
Changed lines 9-13 from:
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
to:
!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
!!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
!!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
Changed lines 17-58 from:
Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."
Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(1).
The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order.
The principal advantage provided by this paragraph is an expanded right to information.
However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order."
For a correctly narrow reading of this provision, see Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., No. 11-1285, 2012 WL 3195759 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012).
----
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.
Creditors routinely use this provision, quite appropriately, to have a "limited purpose receiver" appointed by the court with these powers only to enforce the charging order, but then work to expand the receiver's portfolio over matters to eventually become a general-purpose receiver for the debtor's estate generally.
----
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders [[TopicsReceiverAppointment | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.
This paragraph must be understood in the context of:
(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and
(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
----
to:
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b).
->Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."
->Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.
->This paragraph must be understood in the context of:
-->(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and
-->(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
Added lines 34-43:
->''EXAMPLE:''
->A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
->The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
->Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.
->A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
->The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
->Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.
Deleted lines 45-54:
The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.
EXAMPLE:
Added lines 51-70:
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
->Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
->''EXAMPLE:''
_>Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.
->However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
->A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
!!!Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 6.
->This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article] 10.
->In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
Changed lines 72-74 from:
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power
to:
!!!JayNote
->As the Reporter's Comment indicates, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.
->Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.
->For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
Changed lines 81-89 from:
EXAMPLE:
Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
to:
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
Changed lines 83-87 from:
This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article
In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
to:
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
Changed lines 86-99 from:
Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.
For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal fmt=title:)
to:
!!OTHER ORDERS OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.Other_Orders list=normal fmt=title:)
Changed lines 9-104 from:
to:
!!(b) To the extent necessary to effectuate the collection of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order in effect under subsection (a), the court may:
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b).
Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."
Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(1).
The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order.
The principal advantage provided by this paragraph is an expanded right to information.
However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order."
For a correctly narrow reading of this provision, see Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., No. 11-1285, 2012 WL 3195759 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012).
----
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.
Creditors routinely use this provision, quite appropriately, to have a "limited purpose receiver" appointed by the court with these powers only to enforce the charging order, but then work to expand the receiver's portfolio over matters to eventually become a general-purpose receiver for the debtor's estate generally.
----
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders [[TopicsReceiverAppointment | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.
This paragraph must be understood in the context of:
(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and
(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.
EXAMPLE:
A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.
EXAMPLE:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
EXAMPLE:
Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 6.
This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article] 10.
In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
----
JayNote: As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.
Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.
For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b).
Paragraph (2) refers to "other orders" rather than "additional orders."
Therefore, given appropriate circumstances, a court may invoke Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), or both.
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(1) appoint a receiver of the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order, with the power to make all inquiries the judgment debtor might have made; and
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(1).
The receiver contemplated here is emphatically not a receiver for the limited liability company, but rather a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] subject to the charging order.
The principal advantage provided by this paragraph is an expanded right to information.
However, that right goes no further than "the extent necessary to effectuate the collections of [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] pursuant to a charging order."
For a correctly narrow reading of this provision, see Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. Continuous Control Solutions, Inc., No. 11-1285, 2012 WL 3195759 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012).
----
JayNote: As the comment states, the receiver appointed under ¶ (b) is not, negative, a receiver for the LLC itself, but instead is only a receiver for the [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], and the main advantage to such a receiver is for informational rights. Example: Creditor holds a judgment against debtor, who has disappeared or is recalcitrant. Normally, the creditor would obtain information about [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] from the debtor, but the court may appoint a receiver to obtain this information in the debtor's place.
Creditors routinely use this provision, quite appropriately, to have a "limited purpose receiver" appointed by the court with these powers only to enforce the charging order, but then work to expand the receiver's portfolio over matters to eventually become a general-purpose receiver for the debtor's estate generally.
----
For court opinions discussing the role of receivers and charging orders [[TopicsReceiverAppointment | click here]].
----
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
!!(2) make all other orders necessary to give effect to the charging order.
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 1.
This paragraph must be understood in the context of:
(i) the very limited nature of the charging order; and
(ii) the importance of preventing overreaching on behalf of a person that is not a judgment creditor of the LLC, has no claim on the LLC's assets, and has no right to interfere in the activities, affairs, and management of the LLC. In particular, the court's power to make "all other orders" is limited to "orders necessary to give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 2.
EXAMPLE:
A judgment creditor with a charging order believes that the limited liability company should invest less of its surplus in operations, leaving more funds for [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
The creditor moves the court for an order directing the limited liability company to restrict re-investment.
Subsection (b)(2) does not authorize the court to grant the motion.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 3.
EXAMPLE:
A judgment creditor with a judgment for $10,000 against a member obtains a charging order against the member's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]].
Having been properly served with the order, the limited liability company nonetheless fails to comply and makes a $3000 [[CodeDistribution | distribution]] to the member.
The court has the power to order the limited liability company to pay $3000 to the judgment creditor to "give effect to the charging order."
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 4.
Under Subsection (b)(2), the court has the power to decide whether a particular payment is a [[CodeDistribution | distribution]], because that decision determines whether the payment is part of a [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]] subject to a charging order.
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 5.
EXAMPLE:
Member A of ABC, LLC has for some years received [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] form the LLC.
However, when a judgment creditor of Member A obtains a charging order against Member A's [[CodeTransferTransferableInterest | transferable interest]], the LLC ceases to make [[CodeDistribution | distributions]] to Member A and instead provides a salary to Member A equivalent to former [[CodeDistribution | distributions]].
A court might deem this salary a disguised d[[CodeDistribution | distribution]]. (In any event, however, the salary will be subject to garnishment.)
----
Reporter's Comment to Subsection (b)(2) ¶ 6.
This act has no specific rules for determining the fate or effect of a charging order when the limited liability company undergoes a merger, conversion, interest exchange, or domestication under [Article] 10.
In the proper circumstances, such an organic change might trigger an order under Subsection (b)(2).
----
JayNote: As the Reporter's Comment notes, ¶ 2(b) gives the court wide latitude to fashion additional orders to carry out the charging order, including re-characterizing other income received by the debtor from the LLC as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Example: Creditor is granted a charging order against Barbara's LLC interest. Soon thereafter, the LLC ceases to pay Barbara [[CodeDistribution | distributions]], but she instead receives money from the LLC by way of "loans" or "management fees" or whatever. The court may re-characterize this money (known in creditor-debtor vernacular as "imputed income") as [[CodeDistribution | distributions]]. Ditto if the LLC paid Barbara's personal utility bills and credit cards, etc.
Note that savvy creditor rights counsel will often accompany a charging order with a Writ of Garnishment or some other remedy (or remedies) to as to pick up this other income no matter what the debtor and the LLC calls it.
For an excellent discussion of how a creditor may have the court include ancillary provisions in charging orders to prevent such shenanigans, see Law v. Zemp.
----
For court opinions dealing with compliance with a charging order [[TopicsCompliance | click here]].
----
For court opinions dealing with the charging order procedure generally [[TopicsProcedureRules | click here]].
Added lines 1-15:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!Topic]] [[!TEXT]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal fmt=title:)
----
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!Topic]] [[!TEXT]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal fmt=title:)
----