Site /
Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order
Site.TopicsJurisdictionService History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
Changed lines 43-79 from:
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
# [[2021KansasObergJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-kansas-oberg-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2021.08.30 ... Charging Order Jurisdictional Issues In O’Neal
O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
# [[2021FloridaONealJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-oneal-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2016.02.13 … Charging Orders, Jurisdiction, And The Non-Party Debtor In Spates
Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
# [[2016TexasSpates|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-spates-charging-order.html
----
----
2013.08.16 ... No Jurisdiction Needed Over LLC Which Interests Were Charged In Rockstone Capital
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
# [[2013ConnecticutRockstone|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-connecticut-rockstone-charging-order.html
----
----
Steamfitters Union v. Direct Air, LLC, 2020 WL 6131163 (E.D.Pa., Oct. 19, 2020).
[[2020PennsylvaniaSteamfittersUnionJurisdiction | +]]
----
----
Merrill Ranch Properties, LLC v. Austell, 2016 WL 1176823 (Ga.App., 2016).
# [[2016GeorgiaMerrillRanchLLCStanding|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-georgia-merrill-ranch-llc-standing-charging-order.html
----
----
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, ___ N.E.2d ____, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, 2012 WL 6725894 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., 2012).
# [[2012IllinoisBankAmericaJurisdictionNecessaryParties|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-illinois-bank-america-jurisdiction-necessary-parties-charging-order.html
to:
Changed lines 19-20 from:
** Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
to:
** [[2021KansasObergJurisdiction|+]]
Changed lines 23-24 from:
** O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
to:
** [[2021FloridaONealJurisdiction|+]]
Changed lines 27-28 from:
** Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
to:
** [[2016TexasSpates|+]]
Changed line 31 from:
** Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
to:
** [[2013ConnecticutRockstone|+]]
Changed lines 43-67 from:
to:
2021.09.30 ... Charging Order Interstate Jurisdictional Issues In Oberg
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
# [[2021KansasObergJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-kansas-oberg-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2021.08.30 ... Charging Order Jurisdictional Issues In O’Neal
O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
# [[2021FloridaONealJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-oneal-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2016.02.13 … Charging Orders, Jurisdiction, And The Non-Party Debtor In Spates
Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
# [[2016TexasSpates|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-spates-charging-order.html
----
----
2013.08.16 ... No Jurisdiction Needed Over LLC Which Interests Were Charged In Rockstone Capital
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
# [[2013ConnecticutRockstone|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-connecticut-rockstone-charging-order.html
----
----
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
# [[2021KansasObergJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-kansas-oberg-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2021.08.30 ... Charging Order Jurisdictional Issues In O’Neal
O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
# [[2021FloridaONealJurisdiction|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-florida-oneal-charging-order-jurisdiction.html
----
----
2016.02.13 … Charging Orders, Jurisdiction, And The Non-Party Debtor In Spates
Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
# [[2016TexasSpates|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-texas-spates-charging-order.html
----
----
2013.08.16 ... No Jurisdiction Needed Over LLC Which Interests Were Charged In Rockstone Capital
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
# [[2013ConnecticutRockstone|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-connecticut-rockstone-charging-order.html
----
----
Changed lines 69-73 from:
Arayos, LLC v. Jimmie Ellis, 2016 WL 1642676 (S.D.Ala., 2016).
to:
[[2020PennsylvaniaSteamfittersUnionJurisdiction | +]]
----
----
----
----
Changed lines 75-80 from:
Shanghai Real Estate Ltd
Bank of America, N
to:
# [[2016GeorgiaMerrillRanchLLCStanding|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2016-georgia-merrill-ranch-llc-standing-charging-order.html
----
----
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, ___ N.E.2d ____, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, 2012 WL 6725894 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., 2012).
# [[2012IllinoisBankAmericaJurisdictionNecessaryParties|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-illinois-bank-america-jurisdiction-necessary-parties-charging-order.html
----
----
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, ___ N.E.2d ____, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, 2012 WL 6725894 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., 2012).
# [[2012IllinoisBankAmericaJurisdictionNecessaryParties|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-illinois-bank-america-jurisdiction-necessary-parties-charging-order.html
Changed line 35 from:
** Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. v. McMillin Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4390071 (D.Kan., July 15, 2015).
to:
** [[2015KansasVisionMarketing | +]]
Added lines 14-37:
!!!JURISDICTION ARTICLES
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/09/30/charging-order-interstate-jurisdictional-issues-in-oberg/ | 2021.09.30]] ... Charging Order Interstate Jurisdictional Issues In Oberg
** Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/08/30/charging-order-jurisdictional-issues-in-oneal/ | 2021.08.30]] ... Charging Order Jurisdictional Issues In O’Neal
** O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2016/02/13/charging-orders-jurisdiction-and-the-non-party-debtor-in-spates/ | 2016.02.13]] … Charging Orders, Jurisdiction, And The Non-Party Debtor In Spates
** Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2013/08/16/no-jurisdiction-needed-over-llc-which-interests-were-charged-in-rockstone-capital/ | 2013.08.16]] ... No Jurisdiction Needed Over LLC Which Interests Were Charged In Rockstone Capital
** Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2015/10/14/charging-order-jurisdictional-and-foreign-llc-issues-become-clearer-in-vision-marketing/ | 2015.10.14]] ... Charging Order Jurisdictional And Foreign LLC Issues Become Clearer In Vision Marketing
** Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. v. McMillin Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4390071 (D.Kan., July 15, 2015).
----
Changed lines 43-46 from:
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
to:
Deleted lines 49-50:
Deleted lines 51-52:
Deleted lines 54-55:
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
Changed line 16 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.Jurisdiction list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Jurisdiction list=normal fmt=title:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Jurisdiction
to:
[[!Topic]] Jurisdiction [-TopicsJurisdictionService-]
Changed line 14 from:
!!T!JURISDICTION AND SERVICE OF CHARGING ORDERS OPINIONS
to:
!!!JURISDICTION AND SERVICE OF CHARGING ORDERS OPINIONS
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!jurisdiction]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Jurisdiction
Changed line 16 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.jurisdiction list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Jurisdiction list=normal:)
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary:TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:Summary:
(:description TEXT
(:
to:
(:title Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order:)
(:Summary: Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order:)
(:description Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order:)
(:keywords charging order, jurisdiction:)
(:Summary: Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order:)
(:description Jurisdiction And Service Of Charging Order:)
(:keywords charging order, jurisdiction:)
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!jurisdiction]]
Changed lines 9-12 from:
to:
The courts have frequently struggled the issue of whether there must be personal jurisdiction over the entity for the charging order to be issued. In my opinion, the correct rule would be that that the court does not need jurisdiction in personam to place the lien on the D/M's entity (any more than a creditor would need jurisdiction over Intel to place a lien on the debtor's Intel stock shares), but that personal jurisdiction would be required to enforce the charging order against the entity, i.e., if the court of judgment does not have personal jurisdiction over the entity, then to enforce the charging order against the entity as to distributions the creditor would need to domesticate the judgment in the jurisdiction where the entity is found. However, even as to distributions, the court of judgment would be able to enforce the charging order against the D/M, i.e., compel the D/M to pay over distributions to the creditor, since personal jurisdiction over the D/M has already been established.
At the very least, this issue needs to be fully addressed in the Comment to § 503, but because jurisdiction is a critically important threshold issue, perhaps it would warrant a statutory change.
At the very least, this issue needs to be fully addressed in the Comment to § 503, but because jurisdiction is a critically important threshold issue, perhaps it would warrant a statutory change.
Changed lines 14-17 from:
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT
to:
!!T!JURISDICTION AND SERVICE OF CHARGING ORDERS OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.jurisdiction list=normal:)
(:pagelist link=Category.jurisdiction list=normal:)
Changed lines 19-41 from:
to:
O'Neal v. CDB American Franchise System, Inc., 2021 WL 3709716 (M.D.Fla., Aug. 20, 2021).
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
Steamfitters Union v. Direct Air, LLC, 2020 WL 6131163 (E.D.Pa., Oct. 19, 2020).
German American Capital Corp. v. Morehouse, 2017 WL 3411941 (D.Md., 2017).
Arayos, LLC v. Jimmie Ellis, 2016 WL 1642676 (S.D.Ala., 2016).
Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
Merrill Ranch Properties, LLC v. Austell, 2016 WL 1176823 (Ga.App., 2016).
Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. v. McMillin Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4390071 (D.Kan., July 15, 2015).
Wells Fargo Bank v. Barber, 2015 WL 470589 (M.D.Fla., Feb. 4, 2015).
Shanghai Real Estate Ltd. v. Greenberg, 2014 WL 660624 (Conn.Super., Jan. 28, 2014).
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, ___ N.E.2d ____, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, 2012 WL 6725894 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., 2012).
Oberg v. Lowe, 2021 WL 495043 (D.Kan., Jan. 4, 2021).
Steamfitters Union v. Direct Air, LLC, 2020 WL 6131163 (E.D.Pa., Oct. 19, 2020).
German American Capital Corp. v. Morehouse, 2017 WL 3411941 (D.Md., 2017).
Arayos, LLC v. Jimmie Ellis, 2016 WL 1642676 (S.D.Ala., 2016).
Spates v. Office of the Attorney General, 2016 WL 354417 (Tex.App.14th Dist., Jan. 28, 2016).
Merrill Ranch Properties, LLC v. Austell, 2016 WL 1176823 (Ga.App., 2016).
Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. v. McMillin Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4390071 (D.Kan., July 15, 2015).
Wells Fargo Bank v. Barber, 2015 WL 470589 (M.D.Fla., Feb. 4, 2015).
Shanghai Real Estate Ltd. v. Greenberg, 2014 WL 660624 (Conn.Super., Jan. 28, 2014).
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Marketing Horizons, Ltd., 2013 WL 4046597 (Conn.Super., Unpublished, July 17, 2013).
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, ___ N.E.2d ____, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, 2012 WL 6725894 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., 2012).
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!TEXT]]
Changed lines 8-16 from:
[[<<]]
to:
[[<<]]
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
TEXT
----
!!TEXT OPINIONS
(:pagelist link=Category.TEXT list=normal:)
----
TEXT
Added lines 1-8:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]