Compliance With Charging Orders

Site.TopicsCompliance History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

March 26, 2022, at 03:15 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Deleted lines 78-140:

2021.02.15 ... Debtor’s Large LLC Distribution To Circumvent Charging Order Draws Ire Of Non-Debtor Member In Bargreen
[[Opinion2021WashingtonWholesalerEquityChargingOrderDistribution | +]]
----

Wholesaler Equity Development Corp. v. Bargreen, 2021 WL 321560 (W.D.Wa., Feb. 1, 2021).
----

# [[2020KansasBMODistributionsTransfer|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-kansas-bmo-distributions-transfer-charging-order.html
2020.06.20 ... Payment Of Distributions Directly To Creditor Holding A Charging Order Deemed Appropriate In BMO Case
# [[2020KansasBMODistributionsTransfer|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-kansas-bmo-distributions-transfer-charging-order.html
----

2020.11.26 ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs
# [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-north-dakota-gengs-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html
----

Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).
# [[2018CaliforniaGarcia|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-california-garcia-charging-order.html
----


----

Ex Parte SE Property Holdings LLC (SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Harrell), 2021 WL 5145446 (Ala., Nov. 5, 2021). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-alabama-se-property-charging-order-compliance-contempt.html


* [[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]
----

Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).
[[Opinion2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquareChargingOrder | +]]
https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html
----

2014.01.30 ... Charging Orders And The Contemptuous Partnership
Joshlin Bros. Irrigation v. Sunbelt Rental, Inc., 2014 WL 248104, 2014 Ark. App. 65 (Ark.App., Unpublished, Jan. 22, 2014).
[[Opinion2014ArkansasJoslinBrothersChargingOrder | +]]
https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-arkansas-joslin-brothers-charging-order.html
----

2013.02.24 ... Simply Ignoring Court Orders Is Not The Best Strategy
Seven Arts Pictures, Inc. v. Jonesfilm, 2013 WL 599661 (5th Cir., Feb. 18, 2013).
# [[2013LouisianaJonesfilm|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-louisiana-jonesfilm-charging-order.html
----

2012.06.22 ... Owner Of Debtor LLC Goes To Jail For Contempt For Interfering With Foreclosure Sale
In re Cowstone, LLC, 2012 WL 2205565 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.C., Slip Copy, June 14, 2012).
# [[2012NorthCarolinaCowstone|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-north-carolina-cowstone-charging-order.html
----

Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).
# [[2011ConnecticutBuckeyeRetirement|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2011-connecticut-buckeye-retirement-charging-order.html
----

Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc. v. Sycamore Family Bakery, Inc., 2019 WL 6001940 (D.Utah, Nov. 14, 2019).
# [[2015UtahEarthgrains|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-utah-earthgrains-charging-order.html

----

2018.04.22 ... Creditor Fails To Prove Up Contempt For Violating Charging Order In SE Property
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html
* [[Opinion2018AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrder | +]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html
March 26, 2022, at 02:08 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 100-101 from:
2018.04.22 ... Creditor Fails To Prove Up Contempt For Violating Charging Order In SE Property
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html
to:
Changed line 106 from:
[[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]
to:
* [[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]
Added lines 139-140:
2018.04.22 ... Creditor Fails To Prove Up Contempt For Violating Charging Order In SE Property
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html
March 26, 2022, at 02:07 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 49-50 from:
** G[[2018CaliforniaGarcia|+]]
to:
** [[2018CaliforniaGarcia|+]]
Changed line 53 from:
** [[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]
to:
** [[Opinion2018AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrder | +]]
March 26, 2022, at 02:01 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 105-106 from:
[[Opinion2018AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrder | +]]
to:

Added lines 137-140:

----

* [[Opinion2018AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrder | +]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html
March 26, 2022, at 01:58 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 45-46 from:
** Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).
to:
** [[Opinion2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquareChargingOrder | +]]
Changed line 49 from:
** Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).
to:
** G[[2018CaliforniaGarcia|+]]
March 26, 2022, at 01:57 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added lines 33-34:
** [[Opinion2021WashingtonWholesalerEquityChargingOrderDistribution | +]]
Added lines 37-38:
** [[2020KansasBMODistributionsTransfer|+]]
Added lines 41-42:
** [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy|+]]
Changed lines 53-54 from:
** SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018).
to:
** [[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]
Added lines 57-58:
** [[Opinion2014ArkansasJoslinBrothersChargingOrder | +]]
Added lines 61-62:
** [[2013LouisianaJonesfilm|+]]
Added lines 65-66:
** [[2012NorthCarolinaCowstone|+]]
Changed line 70 from:
** Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).
to:
** [[2011ConnecticutBuckeyeRetirement|+]]
March 26, 2022, at 01:51 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added line 67:
Added lines 69-71:
[[Opinion2021WashingtonWholesalerEquityChargingOrderDistribution | +]]
----

Changed lines 73-74 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 78-79 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 82-83 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 86-87 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 90-91 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 95-96 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 100-101 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 106-107 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 111-112 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 116-117 from:

to:
----
Changed lines 120-121 from:

to:
----
Deleted lines 123-124:

March 26, 2022, at 01:46 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Changed lines 67-68 from:
Ex Parte SE Property Holdings LLC (SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Harrell), 2021 WL 5145446 (Ala., Nov. 5, 2021).
to:
2021.02.15 ... Debtor’s Large LLC Distribution To Circumvent Charging Order Draws Ire Of Non-Debtor Member In Bargreen
Wholesaler Equity Development Corp. v. Bargreen, 2021 WL 321560 (W.D.Wa., Feb. 1, 2021).


# [[2020KansasBMODistributionsTransfer|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-kansas-bmo-distributions-transfer-charging-order.html
2020.06.20 ... Payment Of Distributions Directly To Creditor Holding A Charging Order Deemed Appropriate In BMO Case
# [[2020KansasBMODistributionsTransfer|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-kansas-bmo-distributions-transfer-charging-order.html


2020.11.26 ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs
# [[2020NorthDakotaGengsExclusiveRemedy|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2020-north-dakota-gengs-charging-order-exclusive-remedy.html


Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).
# [[2018CaliforniaGarcia|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-california-garcia-charging-order.html


2018.04.22 ... Creditor Fails To Prove Up Contempt For Violating Charging Order In SE Property
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-alabama-se-property-charging-order.html


Ex Parte SE Property Holdings LLC (SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Harrell), 2021 WL 5145446 (Ala., Nov. 5, 2021). https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2021-alabama-se-property-charging-order-compliance-contempt.html
[[Opinion2018AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrder | +]]
[[Opinion2021AlabamaSEPropertyChargingOrderComplianceContempt | +]]


Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).
[[Opinion2018IllinoisGolfwoodSquareChargingOrder | +]]
https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2018-illinois-golfwood-square-charging-order.html


2014.01.30 ... Charging Orders And The Contemptuous Partnership
Joshlin Bros. Irrigation v. Sunbelt Rental, Inc., 2014 WL 248104, 2014 Ark. App. 65 (Ark.App., Unpublished, Jan. 22, 2014).
[[Opinion2014ArkansasJoslinBrothersChargingOrder | +]]
https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2014-arkansas-joslin-brothers-charging-order.html


2013.02.24 ... Simply Ignoring Court Orders Is Not The Best Strategy
Seven Arts Pictures, Inc. v. Jonesfilm, 2013 WL 599661 (5th Cir., Feb. 18, 2013).
# [[2013LouisianaJonesfilm|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2013-louisiana-jonesfilm-charging-order.html


2012.06.22 ... Owner Of Debtor LLC Goes To Jail For Contempt For Interfering With Foreclosure Sale
In re Cowstone, LLC, 2012 WL 2205565 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.C., Slip Copy, June 14, 2012).
# [[2012NorthCarolinaCowstone|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2012-north-carolina-cowstone-charging-order.html


Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).
# [[2011ConnecticutBuckeyeRetirement|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2011-connecticut-buckeye-retirement-charging-order.html

Changed lines 119-124 from:

Joshlin Bros. Irrigation v. Sunbelt Rental, Inc., 2014 WL 248104, 2014 Ark. App. 65 (Ark.App., Unpublished, Jan. 22, 2014).

Seven Arts Pictures, Inc. v. Jonesfilm, 2013 WL 599661 (5th Cir., Feb. 18, 2013).

In re Cowstone, LLC, 2012 WL 2205565 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.C., Slip Copy, June 14, 2012).
to:
# [[2015UtahEarthgrains|+]] https://chargingorder.com/opinion-2015-utah-earthgrains-charging-order.html
March 26, 2022, at 01:08 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
March 26, 2022, at 01:06 AM by 50.159.12.10 -
Added lines 57-59:

** Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).

Deleted line 76:
Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).
March 24, 2022, at 04:28 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 28-31 from:
!!COMPLIANCE WITH CHARGING ORDER OPINIONS

(:pagelist link=Category.Compliance list=normal:)

to:

!!!COMPLIANCE ARTICLES

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2021/02/15/debtors-large-llc-distribution-to-circumvent-charging-order-draws-ire-of-non-debtor-member-in-bargreen/ | 2021.02.15]] ... Debtor’s Large LLC Distribution To Circumvent Charging Order Draws Ire Of Non-Debtor Member In Bargreen

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/06/20/payment-of-distributions-directly-to-creditor-holding-a-charging-order-deemed-appropriate-in-bmo-case/ | 2020.06.20]] ... Payment Of Distributions Directly To Creditor Holding A Charging Order Deemed Appropriate In BMO Case

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2020/11/26/contempt-not-precluded-by-charging-order-exclusivity-in-gengs/ | 2020.11.26]] ... Contempt Not Precluded By Charging Order Exclusivity In Gengs

* [[https://goo.gl/g2gprW | 2018.09.16]] ... Debtor's Access To LLC Assets For His Personal Purposes Leads To Turnover Order In Golfwood Square

** Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).

* [[https://goo.gl/A1iAgh | 2018.05.31]] ... LLC Manager's Fiduciary Duty Possibly Breached By Not Making A Distribution To Creditor In Garcia

** Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).

* [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2018/04/22/creditor-fails-to-prove-up-contempt-for-violating-charging-order-in-se-property/ | 2018.04.22]] ... Creditor Fails To Prove Up Contempt For Violating Charging Order In SE Property

** SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018).

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2014/01/30/charging-orders-and-the-contemptuous-partnership/ | 2014.01.30]] ... Charging Orders And The Contemptuous Partnership

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2013/02/24/simply-ignoring-court-orders-because-you-disagree-with-them-is-not-the-best-strategy-film-producer-and-production-company-held-in-contempt-for-post-judgment-hi-jinks-in-seven-arts-pictures-case/ | 2013.02.24]] ... Simply Ignoring Court Orders Is Not The Best Strategy

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2012/06/22/owner-of-debtor-llc-goes-to-jail-for-contempt-for-interfering-with-foreclosure-sale/ | 2012.06.22]] ... Owner Of Debtor LLC Goes To Jail For Contempt For Interfering With Foreclosure Sale

* [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayadkisson/2011/08/10/buffas-bad-tuna/ | 2011.8.10]] ... Buffa's Bad Tuna: Debtor Owning 99% Of LLC Attempts To Dodge Charging Order By Paying Oversized Salary To Wife

Added lines 58-63:

!!!COMPLIANCE WITH CHARGING ORDER OPINIONS

(:pagelist link=Category.Compliance list=normal fmt=title:)

----
Deleted lines 66-71:

Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).

Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).

SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018).
March 22, 2022, at 12:38 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] Compliance
to:
[[!Topic]] Compliance [-TopicsCompliance-]
March 20, 2022, at 12:49 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!Topic]] [[!Compliance]]
to:
[[!Topic]] Compliance
Changed line 30 from:
(:pagelist link=Category.compliance list=normal:)
to:
(:pagelist link=Category.Compliance list=normal:)
March 20, 2022, at 12:40 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]] [[!compliance]]
to:
[[!Topic]] [[!Compliance]]
March 19, 2022, at 04:18 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 28-30 from:
!!COMPLYING WITH CHARGING ORDER OPINIONS

(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:)
to:
!!COMPLIANCE WITH CHARGING ORDER OPINIONS

(:pagelist link=Category.compliance list=normal:)
March 19, 2022, at 04:18 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!compliance]]
to:
[[!topic]] [[!compliance]]
Added lines 30-32:
(:pagelist link=Category.abstention list=normal:)

----
March 19, 2022, at 12:52 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!opinions]]
to:
[[!compliance]]
March 19, 2022, at 12:52 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed line 6 from:
[[!topic]]
to:
[[!opinions]]
March 19, 2022, at 12:47 AM by 68.227.20.72 -
Changed lines 1-4 from:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT
:)
to:
(:title Compliance With Charging Orders:)
(:Summary: Remedies to compel compliance with charging order:)
(:description Remedies to compel compliance with charging order:)
(:keywords charging order, comply, compliance, contempt, noncompliance
:)
Changed lines 8-46 from:
[[<<]]
to:
[[<<]]
The Harmonized Acts make no provisions for a court to enforce a charging order, thus leaving the presumption that the appropriate remedy sounds in contempt.

Acts of non-compliance with a charging order typically fit into the following categories:

1. Non-compliance by the entity, by decision of the debtor/member ("D/M");

2. Non-compliance by the entity, by decision another member;

3. Non-compliance by the D/M; and

4. Collusive non-compliance by the D/M, the entity, and/or other members.

There is also a distinction to be drawn between willful non-compliance (what contempt requires) and non-willful non-compliance (i.e., negligence) for which contempt is not available and the creditor's remedy would sound in damages.

The contempt remedy requires the creditor to obtain an Order to Show Cause (OSC) re Contempt (still known in some states as a Writ of Fieri Facias), and go through a lengthy evidentiary hearing process. Conversely, damages for a negligent distribution are usually remedied through a creditor's suit or similar device, similar to where a bank allows a debtor to withdraw money pending a levy. It is probably satisfactory for an expanded Comment to explain this difference.

The non-compliance may also be divided between the making of a distribution to the D/M in violation of the charging order, and the making of so-called "imputed income" to the D/M by paying the D/M's expenses, such as credit cards, car leases, etc. This issue probably requires a change to § 503 to make it clear that all consideration of any kind passing to a D/M is subject to the charging order, and that the entity is directly liable to the creditor for a like amount of the consideration given by the entity but not distributed to the creditor.

----
!!COMPLYING WITH CHARGING ORDER OPINIONS

Ex Parte SE Property Holdings LLC (SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Harrell), 2021 WL 5145446 (Ala., Nov. 5, 2021).

Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc. v. Sycamore Family Bakery, Inc., 2019 WL 6001940 (D.Utah, Nov. 14, 2019).

Golfwood Square LLC v. O'Malley, 2018 IL App (1st) 172220-U, 2018 WL 4370875 (Ill.App., Unpublished, Sept. 11, 2018).

Garcia v. Garcia, 2018 WL 2316522 (Cal.App. Distr. 5, Unpublished, May 22, 2018).

SE Property Holdings, LLC v. The Rookery, LLC, S.D.Ala. Civil No. 11-0014-WS-C (April 13, 2018).

Joshlin Bros. Irrigation v. Sunbelt Rental, Inc., 2014 WL 248104, 2014 Ark. App. 65 (Ark.App., Unpublished, Jan. 22, 2014).

Seven Arts Pictures, Inc. v. Jonesfilm, 2013 WL 599661 (5th Cir., Feb. 18, 2013).

In re Cowstone, LLC, 2012 WL 2205565 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.C., Slip Copy, June 14, 2012).

Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Buffa, 2011 WL 6299681 (D.Conn., Dec. 16 2011).
March 17, 2022, at 04:43 PM by 68.227.20.72 -
Added lines 1-8:
(:title TEXT:)
(:Summary: TEXT:)
(:description TEXT:)
(:keywords charging order, TEXT:)
(:linebreaks:)
[[!topic]]
[[<<]]
[[<<]]